This is NOT what I am talking, not about cost, it's stupidity or design without using any common sense. Here are the two most disappointing examples. Both are supposed to be at least out door, or survival type of knives, not the dressy slim pocket knives that thinness, light weight, small foot print that are the most important.
1) Off-Grid Enforcer:
https://www.offgridknives.com/EnforcerXL/
This looks like a heavy duty knife, but the name and by the looks. It's heavy enough, thick enough with thick blade and thick handle. Everything looks robust on the outside. It's Tanto tip so the tip is strong. BUT, if you look at inside. At the blade pivot point, the blade part is thick, but look at the two side plates that form the handle:
[url=https://postimg.cc/QKst1qmk]
[/URL]
That part is milled
paper thin on both side plates. This definitely a very weak point of the knife. It is so easy to mill part of it on the blade as the blade is very thick without changing the dimension of the knife at all and you can get that part very robust. Cost is absolute minimal.
The kicker is I bought the Off Grid Baby Rhino, it is smaller, thinner and lighter in all dimensions. It was well designed, they milled just on the blade on both sides, they managed to give the
thickness of 0.07" which is very robust.
[url=https://postimg.cc/cvQdM3KF]
[/URL]
They know how to design, both are NOT cheap knives, why they screwed up that bad on the Enforcer and made the Baby Rhino that good?
2) Sencut Acumen:
https://www.sencut.com/products/sen...-handle-2-98-black-stonewashed-9cr18mov-sa06c
Look at the looks and the dimensions, it's NOT a slim small knife, it's obvious is meant for outdoor or survival purpose, not a dress up pocket knife. The dimension is quite thick with big handle. The side plate is 0.06" thick, same as a few other heavy duty knives. BUT, if you look carefully the pivot hole on the blade. It's very thin. ONLY
0.03" thick.
[url=https://postimg.cc/8jbS7SxY]
[/URL]
There is no reason for that. I have smaller knives that has thinner handles and are thicker (double that to 0.06") at that area. People manage to do it without extra expense and extra effort or sacrifice the dimensions and weight. It's so easy to fix and no extra cost.
These are example of STUPID engineering, that is NOT for cost cutting or other limiting factor.
Now, I am not saying this area is the most critical part of the knife, the tip of the blade is obviously most critical. But you can easily see how tough is the tip of the blade by looking, not DECEIVING like my examples. Both have wide blade tips that make it very strong, but the bottle neck is the pivot point.
THIS is NOT about what you said to design barely to meet the spec for cost or time cutting. This is pure stupidity. You see too many products fail due to lousy engineering, you'd be surprised how many so called engineer don't know how to design. If you work in the industry with engineers, you'd be amazed how lack of common sense some people are even graduated from a good college. When I was still working as the manager of engineering, I don't even put a lot of weight on their education or pass experience. I gave candidate test questions. It's not that hard you need text books and all. Just very common sense questions. You'd be amazed how few can pass the exam. They don't pass the exam, I don't even want to talk to them, just a few polite words and sent them away!!!!