Buddy,
I understand and empathise with a lot of what you are saying, but I also think you are painting with a pretty broad brush, there are just as many good guys as there are bad (more of the former probably) in this game. I have seen and experienced much of what you reference, makers with preferential customers who get faster deliveries, better prices, other knives jumping the queue and some pretty creative pricing ...... I have also benefitted from these, as I am sure you have by your own admission.
The reality is that if you are going to be a "successful" collector , and here I define "successful" as having the "best makers, rare pieces, high ROI etc" (caveat: I do not agree with this definition

) then you have to be prepared to put your ego on the back burner, do some serious networking, kiss the right butts, and have a lot of money. It is not just the makers at fault in the scenarios you describe, collectors make it very easy for makers to behave in a certain way. As a collector, when you go down this route without knowing the commitment you have made then disaster can strike. If I read you correctly then you have chosen a different route ......
I have to say though if you read your first post in this thread in isolation it does come off rather arrogant and even a little condescending, BUT, I have read enough from you to know this not to be the case.
Kevin,
Reference:
Why don't collectors focus on available market and not have so many knives on order.
You/We/I cannot control the way collectors behave just by saying it should be so. Look at the factors that cause the behaviour that you say is wrong.
THE single biggest factor in going direct to the maker is to get the lowest available price from an in demand maker so that you can be confident of getting a good ROI ......... why is everyone doing this? Because a lot of people keep telling them that to be a good collector you need to pay attention to ROI. A collector cannot do this by paying the premiums expected in the secondary market and from some dealers. The irony of course is that because of this the secondary market drops and so does the ROI that caused the behaviour in the first place ......
Factor in also the often the availability of the sort after knives in the secondary market can be controlled by a very tight network of collectors, which creates barriers to entry for a good secondary market.
On the selling off of knives: Why do collectors sell off at a loss to fund new knives
I think dealers and makers can play a bigger role in this:
If a dealer expects 20 to 30% commission on a sale, why shouldn't a collector opt to sell privately at 15% below market, he gets more money and probably sells quicker: I think LONG TERM dealers and consuqently makers and collectors would see the benefit of "trade-in" policy ( yes Les, thats you

) or low commission rates c. 5-10%.
Makers ... why not offer to help the collector resell via their site or via show tables.
I actually think the CKCA has the potential to do some good here. I would suggest the following:
- Offering a low cost medium for the sale collector knives, with a "market rate" condition.
- Co-ordinating the exchange and swapping of "Makers Slots" that collectors may be holding. eg. "I'll swap you my Fisk slot in June, for your Newton Slot in July".
..... Off my soap box.
Stephen