I see Unbreakable's I-Trader rating has been restored to 100%.
I totally agree with this claim, and though I know some here would rather let it rest, I'm addressing the "good guy" idea nonetheless. Insomnia or a headache are both poor excuses for a lapse in ethical behavior, and I think there's a little too much credit being given here by a number of folks. I understand the need to smooth over ruffles and restore peace in a social setting, but not at the expense of being naive about the situation.
Consider someone who smears your name in public and then, only after being called out on it, throws up an apology. I'm a little less convinced that such an offering makes the offending party a "good guy" or "a man." Public figures make such apologies all the time--not so much because they truly believe in them, but because they fear the repercussions if they don't.
It would be different if dobywon had apologized of his own accord soon after faking the I-Trader rating. Given the order of events, however, it makes it appear that he fears banning more than he feels remorse for lying and sullying Unbreakable's I-trader reputation. No idea if this assessment is correct, but such is the appearance. Given that sparks were still flying a bit in this thread after the first apology, it makes me wonder how contrite dobywon truly is.
Maybe I'm just cynical though. Maybe this response is as good an indication as any that I really do need to get away from BFC for a while.
The hope, of course, is that dobywon does gain some maturity from this experience. And yes, to a degree, he should get some credit for coming into this thread and responding to his actions and apologizing. Avoiding the issue would have been much worse. But there's a little too much back patting going on in this thread IMO. What about commending Unbreakable for bringing this one to our attention?