Microtech Production Whale Shark Has Arrived

Status
Not open for further replies.
You forgot Benchmade's OTF offerings. Guess MT should look for design inspiration there next.

snowreaper1 said:
You are totally off base and seems like you aren't grasping why people despise Microtech. Sure all knives share certain features and design elements. With all the knife companies and makers its
almost impossible not to. BUT..... when an American company makes a CLONE of another American made product that is copied down to the exact T and slaps their name and logo on it and claims
it as there own your dealing with a real deushe bag. Especially considering the high anticipation and profile the 0777 has gained being Blades knife of the year.

And Microtech doesn't own the OTF concept and design. I wish Protech would starting producing OTF's so Microtech would finally have some competition. The only alternative to them is China made
pieces of crap so of course Microtech OTF's are going to seem so much better when in fact their just still in business by default.
Click to expand...
 
type O said:
First of all, Esav, why are you involved here? Are rules being violated? If not, then why throw your weight around?

Second, I level the same question at Thomas. Does a General topic really warrant your heavy hand every single time your pet peeve crops up? Boundaries dude!

Third, does this mean that Welk doesn't recognize the 777 / Knockout lock as an "incremental advance on locks already in use"? Because I believe that's exactly what it is. Why would a different set of rules apply to Kershaw than apply to Reeve & Walker?

Hey Thomas, be as territorial as you want to be, but could you at least call it what it is? And could you do it in your own subforum? Thank you.
Click to expand...

:eek:This thread just keeps getting better.
 
type O said:
First of all, Esav, why are you involved here? Are rules being violated? If not, then why throw your weight around?
Click to expand...

Mods are members, too. They have just as much right and reason to voice their opinion on a given matter as any other member. What makes you think otherwise?

And could you do it in your own subforum? Thank you.
Click to expand...

You're showing up to a public forum, which is free, and asking or expecting another member to follow your wishes, why? If you're welcome to voice your opinion in this thread, in this forum (which you are), why wouldn't Thomas be?

If you don't like what's being posted, you're always welcome to go elsewhere (on this forum or otherwise). No one's forcing you to participate.
 
type O said:
First of all, Esav, why are you involved here? Are rules being violated? If not, then why throw your weight around?

Second, I level the same question at Thomas. Does a General topic really warrant your heavy hand every single time your pet peeve crops up? Boundaries dude!

Third, does this mean that Welk doesn't recognize the 777 / Knockout lock as an "incremental advance on locks already in use"? Because I believe that's exactly what it is. Why would a different set of rules apply to Kershaw than apply to Reeve & Walker?

Hey Thomas, be as territorial as you want to be, but could you at least call it what it is? And could you do it in your own subforum? Thank you.
Click to expand...
Tony is that you?
 
Just because someone's a mod doesn't mean they can't have an opinion.

Eternal, sorry your thread is getting dumped on - if you're not interested in the politics, enjoy the product based on your own enjoyment of it. The real wonder is how this is still in general.
 
Nice AYB, couldn't agree more. Seems like someone's kicked over a rock here and we, unfortunately, get to see what crawls out. :eek:

allyourblood said:
Mods are members, too. They have just as much right and reason to voice their opinion on a given matter as any other member. What makes you think otherwise?



You're showing up to a public forum, which is free, and asking or expecting another member to follow your wishes, why? If you're welcome to voice your opinion in this thread, in this forum (which you are), why wouldn't Thomas be?

If you don't like what's being posted, you're always welcome to go elsewhere (on this forum or otherwise). No one's forcing you to participate.
Click to expand...
 
Pete2s said:
ZT is all original, right? The liner lock on the 0200? Stolen by Michael Walker. The frame lock on the 0300? Stolen by Chris Reeve. The patents are pending.
...
Click to expand...

You serious, I mean really serious? This is a joke right? It must be a joke, otherwise it just be plan stupid to say. I'm gonna laugh now... hahaha... FAIL!

-sh00ter
 
type O said:
First of all, Esav, why are you involved here? Are rules being violated? If not, then why throw your weight around?

Second, I level the same question at Thomas. Does a General topic really warrant your heavy hand every single time your pet peeve crops up? Boundaries dude!

Third, does this mean that Welk doesn't recognize the 777 / Knockout lock as an "incremental advance on locks already in use"? Because I believe that's exactly what it is. Why would a different set of rules apply to Kershaw than apply to Reeve & Walker?

Hey Thomas, be as territorial as you want to be, but could you at least call it what it is? And could you do it in your own subforum? Thank you.
Click to expand...

WAY OUT OF LINE.

This thread is closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top