A couple things went wrong with the OP's first post, starting with Carbon Fiber and GEC.
So when I read the OP's post I knew he was headed for possible trouble.
This sub forum is dominated by folks who like traditional knives. Don't get me wrong, that's a not a bad thing. Knives built with traditional methods and materials, with what they consider a traditional steel aka 1095. Some even sharpen on the bottom of a coffee cup. An act for the record, that I consider a sinful thing to do to a perfectly good knife.
GEC is a current favorite here, with a business model of creating quality traditional knives with traditional methods and materials. So even the suggestion of GEC working with G10, Glass Fiber, Carbon Fiber, M390, S35VN, etc, is going generate negative reactions from folks.
The OP had an idea, a little off base with the graphite and titanium but still an idea. No different than Ford building Lincoln or Toyota building Lexus. I don't think I would want to see a titanium barlow though, that would just not be right.
GEC has a niche market of quality traditionally built knives. It's a very expensive way to build knives, especially these days. Over time those labor & material costs will rise and their market will shrink. $70 to $200 for a 1095 bladed knife is a lot of money.
Those factors alone may/will force GEC to evolve or die, like so many knife makers of the past.
There's a lot of kids growing up on powered steel, assisted, flippy, overbuilt knives today. When they get tired of such silliness and start looking at a more practical knife. A CPM154 traditional built with modern machinery to modern tolerances, might be the ticket that keeps traditional knives going for another 100 years.
Knives evolve they always have and they always will.
Steel evolves it always has and always will.
Manufacturing methods evolve they always have and always will.
What doesn't evolve dies.