mods regarding negative feedback

[craytab]

Reviewed by who?

Exactly. The already overworked volunteer moderators? The very busy business owner who also happens to be the owner of BFC? This is not a new discussion. It is the way it is because it works most of the time. If people want it changed start a thread in Tech Support with exact details on how this is to be accomplished. Discussion with hypothetical vagueries is pointless, especially with how off topic it is here.

 

[vic2367]

It would appear that way, yes. You are correct. Just as it would appear that as we find these folks doing it, we simply ban them and report their info to stopforumspam.com and let them sort things out with any other forums they'd like to join. However, if there is an issue with someone randomly sniping people with negative feedback, then you can rest assured the feedback would be removed.

It's only when people are plain lazy and/or ignorant and cannot be bothered to read and follow instructions that there is no hurry or pressing need for action in matters such as this one. As for the rest, we rely on the honor system in this regard. Spark has mentioned he can just simply remove iTrader scores entirely and be done with the whole damn thing. But since members find it useful and most use it with respect to the way it was initialy intended it is still here.

Unlike the issue with why bumping threads to the top and casual commentary was removed. It was also based on the honor system, but a handful of asshats would think it was worth the risk bumping their shit back to the top 5 times a day while trying to disguise it as back patting one another. We aren't slowing down at all, we've just getting started.

reddevil

thank you for the kind words ..im begining regret my gold member staus here

 

[vic2367]

ulf krogstad ,,in this thread i wasnt refering to our sale ,,we are ok

and if some people here wont deal with me , its ok

i never cheated ,stole or short changed anyone here in all my years here ,,so its ok ,,

just to bring this up again ,,

i never cheated anyone here ever,,if you dont want to deal with me fine

but maybe ill make my own "database" on who to avoid buyers ..

 

[wtlj]

Please put me on your list first vic.

 

[Morrow]

reddevil

thank you for the kind words ..im begining regret my gold member staus here

Having a paid membership doesn't put you above the rules. Both parties here violated Exchange rules by leaving Feedback for a transaction that never took place. Spark makes the final call but it's unlikely he's going to take any action to help out anyone who can't be bothered to read the rules. I'm not sure what else there is to talk about.

 

[RevDevil]

reddevil

thank you for the kind words ..im begining regret my gold member staus here

No problem. Sorry you feel that way, but at the same time by making that comment says quite a lot about your personality and character. One tip for you, wherever you go, I don't care where it is, there will be rules, laws, restrictions, etc. if you are simply too lazy to read them have an entitlement atitude, or feel that you are somehow exempt from "all that", you will haev a very interesting time to put it neutrally. You seem to be having a terribly tough time understadning the concept of rules, I'm not sure why.

just to bring this up again ,,

i never cheated anyone here ever,,if you dont want to deal with me fine

but maybe ill make my own "database" on who to avoid buyers ..

No one said you cheated anyone, building a strawman at this point is ridiculous and does nothing to bolster your position. What is lear is the matter that you said you didn't read the rules, you been around for 10 years on and off. Again, in case you missed it, you tried to make your own rules up that was beyond the normally accepted way of doing things, and you are reaping the rewards of your inability to so something quite simple. Accountability, you need to have some. A database to avoid buyers is also on a silly side, the people posting did't give you negative feedback for not selling to them.

 

[Gizmoman]

:applouse::applouse::applouse::applouse::applouse::applouse::applouse::applouse::applouse::applouse::applouse::applouse:
Well put Rev..Well put.........

 

[gonebad395]

The forum has rules almost everywhere you look it tells you to read them. Not fully comprehending them is one thing just not reading them is another. And you see it all the time when a dispute is going on the question did you read the rules. And the answer to that question is almost always no but yet the guilty one is Here to cry bitch and moan about it like the mods don't have enough on their plates. Laziness isn't a excuse but it seems to be used as one more and more everyday here and in the real world. In my opinion once you do something stupid and then admit you didn't read the rules you should be banned plain and simple save everyone else the headache of dealing with someone not worth dealing with. And a for the op making the database for buyers not to deal with please add me also save me the time

 

[Insipid Moniker]

just to bring this up again ,,

i never cheated anyone here ever,,if you dont want to deal with me fine

but maybe ill make my own "database" on who to avoid buyers ..

You can always put people on your ignore list. Of course, you'd already know that if you'd read everything about the forum...

 

[KELAMA]

The one statistic that I find most astonishing; ironic actually:

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/itrader.php?u=177990&page=2&pp=20

How on Earth, does a member here on BladeForums, navigate himself around this forum (having not read the rules), maintain 100% positive feedback for an entire decade...

only to wake up one day & have a once in a lifetime nightmare transaction of biblical proportions? Three negatives related to ONE transaction...& now Vic's at 87.5% percent (which is still a strong B by the way...I'm quite certain that this has to be, some sort of BF record?

Vic- if you would just apologize (especially to the Moderators), admit that you are wrong in this case- then just maybe, this would be a positive start in putting this bizarre episode in the rear view mirror. To throw an otherwise 10 year positive history that you've had on this forum, away, & implode over one crazy transaction, just doesn't make sense. Come on man! :thumbup:

 

[vic2367]

kelama , you are right

i do apologize for not reading and understanding the rules ,,i have been here a long time , also enjoy the many people who are on this forum ,and those that arent anymore .

no more negative feedback from me anymore .

again , to those who i left a negative feedback ,i will try to undo it .

my apologies to all

vic

 

[jbmonkey]

^darn good start. Good job, Sir. On to better times..........

 

[Twodogknight]

I joined in 2008 but stopped logging in for a while due to events IRL.

When I logged back in again recently I found that I'd somehow earned an infraction in 2010 (despite, to my knowledge, never having logged in in '10).

The infraction was unclear to me and i was given all of 24 hours to correct whatever i did despite me not having logged in for 2+ years prior and 3+ years after.

I thought it was weird to have broken a rule w/o being here but there seemed no harm/no foul.

Just a strange occurrence imho.

 

[Esav Benyamin]

Please go to http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...d-a-User-Emerson-CQC-11?p=8721805#post8721805 and then to post #6. Yes, you were there.

I joined in 2008 but stopped logging in for a while due to events IRL.

When I logged back in again recently I found that I'd somehow earned an infraction in 2010 (despite, to my knowledge, never having logged in in '10).

The infraction was unclear to me and i was given all of 24 hours to correct whatever i did despite me not having logged in for 2+ years prior and 3+ years after.

I thought it was weird to have broken a rule w/o being here but there seemed no harm/no foul.

Just a strange occurrence imho.

 

[KELAMA]

I joined in 2008 but stopped logging in for a while due to events IRL.

When I logged back in again recently I found that I'd somehow earned an infraction in 2010 (despite, to my knowledge, never having logged in in '10).

The infraction was unclear to me and i was given all of 24 hours to correct whatever i did despite me not having logged in for 2+ years prior and 3+ years after.

I thought it was weird to have broken a rule w/o being here but there seemed no harm/no foul.

Just a strange occurrence imho.

^ I'm guessing that 5+ year old infraction (warning actually) you did in fact receive, expired well over 4 1/2 years ago!

Please go to http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...d-a-User-Emerson-CQC-11?p=8721805#post8721805 and then to post #6. Yes, you were there.

^ You're "The Man," Esav...keeping some of us member's down!

 

[KELAMA]

BTW Twodogknight- what on Earth did the warning you received back in October of 2010, have to do with this member specific thread here in the GBU, here in 2016?