My first knife sold!!!!

Allow me to insert another thought: This may have been Butch's first knife sold and he has just started making knives, but Butch has been making what I call art since he was a little kid.

Years ago Ray Appleton showed me his first knife, it was an outstanding fixed blade and would be considered a high ticket knife. I said wow, Ray said sure this is my first knife, but it is not my first ride. I have been working at this stuff for many years, this includes a teloscoping rack that carried a camera to some far away planet and worked.

Are his knives an exact clone of mine? Not really, he has his own thoughts and should you lay one of his knives next to mine and study them carefully, you would see some differences. Butch is absolutely focused when he forges, and walks the thermal tight rope with precision. His are not what could be considered a simple clone, the uninitiated might think so, but to those who look closely will note our differences.

When you wish to discuss clones you should spend several weeks studying Fladerman's Bowie Knife Book, study the Sheffield Bowies carefully and then seek to find those who have developed their own styles.
 
Ed Fowler said:
Allow me to insert another thought: This may have been Butch's first knife sold and he has just started making knives, but Butch has been making what I call art since he was a little kid.

Are his knives an exact clone of mine? Not really, he has his own thoughts and should you lay one of his knives next to mine and study them carefully, you would see some differences. His are not what could be considered a simple clone, the uninitiated might think so, but to those who look closely will note our differences.

When you wish to discuss clones you should spend several weeks studying Fladerman's Bowie Knife Book, study the Sheffield Bowies carefully and then seek to find those who have developed their own styles.

I have been a working artist for over half my life and that has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on what price that I would/should/could command on my first knife offered for sale. My brother-in-law could/would offer me well over $1,000 for it, and I would be just as likely to give it to him, but neither is a real test of value/realistic asking price.

I have looked at your work, and that of Audra's early work, and Bill's, and I say "close enough". The Colt 1911 and the Les Baer 1911 are quite different in many ways, but they are close enough.

I have studied Flyderman's book, and can rattle off the names of true cutlery artisans, working in a completely non-derivative format the way most people rattle off the names of close friends and family. That is because they are.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
Kohai999 said:
I am not a knifemaker, but I have made knives.

I have bought and sold knives, for a portion of my life, as a professional.

Ed, I hate disagreeing with you in public, but as long as it is civilized, let the games begin.

"Dues ? My thoughts are that they are earned by seeking to know the soul of lady knife and caressing her from start to finish in complete control and understanding of each and every stage of her development. "

Paying dues is a long and complex process. It begins with the commitment of time, something that you understand. There is very little by way of substitution for the investment of time.

This is time invested on the art and craft of a knife, but it is also time at shows, eating crappy food for days, making your back hurt on the concrete floor, and knowing the feeling of a light income, or none at all.

This is time spent at hammer-ins, swap meets, like-minded people's houses, it is called building and adding to the community. Butch might be a swell guy, but is he going to go the distance, or is he going to (God Forbid) die tomorrow, physically or spiritually, never to make a knife again? If the time commitment is not made, the knives do not hold a REAL value, irrespective of maker. There may be a commensurate asking price, but who will bite? Butch made his first knife, and sold it for $1,200. Great!, and I mean it.

He can do that a few times, but it is not sustainable by copying the style that you created. I do not believe the market will support it. I have written my opinions of Audra's adoption of the Ken Onion Style of Ed Fowler Bladesmithing, but at least, it is not boldface copy, or unimaginative emulation.

There are far too many expressing a truly unique voice in this medium to have the cloning that has occurred in the past, and continues now. I make jokes, frequently, that Jerry Fisk should hand out kit knives for entry into the JS and MS ranks, that is how some of the knives are looking, coming out of the ABS these days.

For someone who speaks SO eloquently and intelligently about Art and the internal voice of emotion, allowing your proteges' to become carbon copies is a disservice to yourself, them, and the rest of us. Paying dues is finding out who you are, singing with your own voice, what value you offer to the world, and never being satisfied with "good enough".


Best Regards,

STeven Garsson

(PS, I also find it quite ungentlemanly that Shane(bein' ANOTHER Ed Fowler protege', put the statement out there like he did, it FEELS like a shill in a game of three-card monty)

Man, Steven. You took what I was thinking and put it, quite eloquently, into lots of well thought out words. Heck, I was just wondering if we were now going to start seeing ads in Blade magazine that read, "The second(or is it the third) closest thing to an Ed Fowler knife you can get!". :eek: ;) :)
 
Danbo said:
Man, Steven. You took what I was thinking and put it, quite eloquently, into lots of well thought out words. Heck, I was just wondering if we were now going to start seeing ads in Blade magazine that read, "The second(or is it the third) closest thing to an Ed Fowler knife you can get!". :eek: ;) :)


You make for a quite interesting point Dan.


-Nick-
 
It's great to learn knifemaking from a highly experienced maker but I think everyone should adopt their own style of knifemaking. Copying another makers style will never show your individuality.
Scott
 
Come to think of it, I don't think any of you guys have paid your $450 yet, so you all better watch it! :rolleyes:

Getting serious again... Keep this in mind when talking about dues and whatnot: how many times have you heard a knifemaker say something along the lines of "Man, I tried for years to make folders and they wer all crap. Then I spent a few hours one morning at so-and-so's shop and I can knock these things out in my sleep..." or something to that effect. Much of the "dues" people have paid in certain professions are because they were pioneers. One of the chiropractic techniques I practice began development by a doctor in 1932 and he continued to research, change and refine the technique until he died in the early '90's. I learned the technique between reading his manuals, going to seminars and using it in practice, in a few months. I didn't have to reinvent the wheel. When someone who knows something takes you under their wing and shows you the ropes, the learning curve is a LOT faster than when you have to figure it all out for yourself.

As more and more knifemaking information gets out there, it gets easier and more acceptable that new makers can produce a good knife. Who's this kid Burnley or something like that? New maker, young kid, and I see his knives in every magazine every time I turn a page. They look terrific and the reviews are great. Because he's young and new at this, does that NECESSARILY mean that he makes a worse knife than an old guy?

Knifemaking is a physical motor skill and also a knowledge art. You have to know things to be able to do them. The first guy to quench steel to harden it probably had to do it a bunch of times to figure it out, not to mention tempering. Once he had it figured out at that time, he could show Joe Caveman in the next cave over how to do it in a few minutes. Weeks, months, maybe years of work were distilled into a few hours of hands-on instruction.

So, I don't buy the whole dues-paying thing. You don't have to starve. You don't have to divorce your wife and shoot your dog and try to kill yourself and live on the streets and eat ramen and go into prostitution to be a better knifemaker. Just my opinion. I hope this guy Devereaux never sells a knife for less than $1200 (unless it's to me) and I hope he can sell one a week. That'd be nice. You can make ten $120 knives or one $1200 knife.

The downside, though, is that people are going to get the idea that if they go out to Ed's ranch and take his course that they'll be able to crank out $1200 pieces right off the bat, too. Two things are going to happen: 1) The market is going to get saturated for that knife at that price and 2) Sheep are going to become extinct! :D
 
I have not been at the computer all day...or I would have responded sooner.

To Mr. Garsson,
I asked the question because nobody else would.

I am apalled at Mr. Deveraux's thread. It is unprofessional, unethical, and disrespectful for him to post the buyer's name and the price in public forum.

You mentioned I was some part in a shill game. Earlier today I would have gone fisticuffs with you over that remark. After sending emails to Ed all day long I realize I was...unknowingly a part of some type of clever attempt to stir up trouble. Ed wanted some controversy...maybe the reason the price was posted was to stir up some flack. I don't know and frankly I do not care.

Nobody has said this either so I will. The only reason his knife sold for
that is because he was standing next to Ed Fowler. If he doesn't know that, somebody should tell him.

You guys are the experts...you got all the answers. What really amazes me is everybody but Butch has answered the question...Ed has spoken for him...

If you want to question my integrity...go ahead.

No doubt this is not the end of this thread.

The question stands unanswered.

Shane
 
"the soul of lady knife and caressing her from start to finish" - now I have met a few sharp tounged ladies in my life (real ones) and done a little caressing here and there through the years but I personally prefer my ladies to be a little softer and not nearly as sharp as a knife!
Congrats on selling your first knife but don't count on getting that for everything you make.
 
Chiro75 said:
Come to think of it, I don't think any of you guys have paid your $450 yet, so you all better watch it! :rolleyes:

"Man, I tried for years to make folders and they wer all crap. Then I spent a few hours one morning at so-and-so's shop and I can knock these things out in my sleep..." or something to that effect. Much of the "dues" people have paid in certain professions are because they were pioneers.

As more and more knifemaking information gets out there, it gets easier and more acceptable that new makers can produce a good knife. Who's this kid Burnley or something like that? New maker, young kid, and I see his knives in every magazine every time I turn a page. They look terrific and the reviews are great. Because he's young and new at this, does that NECESSARILY mean that he makes a worse knife than an old guy?

Knifemaking is a physical motor skill and also a knowledge art. You have to know things to be able to do them. The first guy to quench steel to harden it probably had to do it a bunch of times to figure it out, not to mention tempering. Once he had it figured out at that time, he could show Joe Caveman in the next cave over how to do it in a few minutes. Weeks, months, maybe years of work were distilled into a few hours of hands-on instruction.

So, I don't buy the whole dues-paying thing. You don't have to starve. You don't have to divorce your wife and shoot your dog and try to kill yourself and live on the streets and eat ramen and go into prostitution to be a better knifemaker. Just my opinion. I hope this guy Devereaux never sells a knife for less than $1200 (unless it's to me) and I hope he can sell one a week. That'd be nice. You can make ten $120 knives or one $1200 knife.

The downside, though, is that people are going to get the idea that if they go out to Ed's ranch and take his course that they'll be able to crank out $1200 pieces right off the bat, too. Two things are going to happen: 1) The market is going to get saturated for that knife at that price and 2) Sheep are going to become extinct! :D

Steve,

Not talking about skills here. That part we will agree on. The new crop of makers has it easier in terms of re-inventing the wheel, materials and tool access. It is easy for a new maker to slap some great pearl slabs on a piece, and buy damascus from any number of top-notch suppliers and have a mighty fine looking knife, if they have the basic skills, frequently resulting in a knife that would have been master class quality only five years before. This raising of the bar requires us to revisit standards, raise the bar, and the expectation level, as well as the relationship of skill to value.

I was talking about value. Just because it looks like a Fowler or to a lesser degree of cost, a Burke, does not make it so. We can all agree that $20,000 for a Loveless Big Bear is a lot of money for a knife, but it seems to be holding value. Same for a Steve Johnson rendition, at significantly less, around $4,000. Next we have John Young at around $1,000 and rising, and just for flavor, Geno Denning at around $800, but he is too damn stubborn to raises his prices to where they should be. So, we have a nice cross-representation of a style and pricing, allowing most desiring that genre of knife to attain it. All these makers have put in enough time to be recognized for having their own rendition of executing the Master's lines.

Ed and Bill have put in their time, paid their dues. Bill has been around AT LEAST 6 years as a maker, because I remember the first time I saw him, and it was in 1997, at the OKCA. Not saying that Butch should not ask the price, but I personally would not pay it. That is for those with more money than I have, and perhaps, less of a cynical worldview. I want sweat equity, and I want to know that the knives that I purchase will hold their value, or to make as best an educated guess as I can, and not get caught up in the irrational exhuberance of the moment.

Mr. Justice, I understand your frustration, but I did not call you a shill. I said I feel that this is like a shill in a 3 card monte game. If you were manipulated, either by circumstance or by design, it is not a great position to be in. I do not know you, nor your situation with Ed, but I do know Ed. I would not PRESUME to question your integrity or your honor, I only develop opinions on those that I know. I don't mince words, and I stand behind what I say, and I don't backpedal or retreat. I believe for myself, that I will be judged for my words, as much as my actions.

I do know that Ed holds the pursuit of the high performance Blade as dear as he holds life itself, maybe more, and that he wants to see others work towards it, continuing after he is gone. I even understand why.

Again, why Ed allows his prodigies to emulate his style is beyond me. I know that people have come to expect this from Bill Burke, but I can tell you from personal experience that he can do a WHOLE lot more aesthetically than sheephorn, brass and a triple thermal cycled 52100 blade, and does so when economics permits.
 
shane justice said:
You mentioned I was some part in a shill game. Earlier today I would have gone fisticuffs with you over that remark. After sending emails to Ed all day long I realize I was...unknowingly a part of some type of clever attempt to stir up trouble. Ed wanted some controversy...

I dont know about controversy, but it seems like someone wouldnt mind turning this forum into a bill board for certain knives and certain knifemaking classes:

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=351657&page=1

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=351717

Not that I have any problem with a man furthering his business, but these forums in general are more "Gee, look what I learned/made, and here's how you can learn/make it too." A place to share and ask questions.

In contrast, these posts are "Wow, look at how great my knife is." and "Look at how rich you will become, and the great knives you can make if you come to my classes."

And with all due respect, maybe it would seem less like a shill game if the involved parties (not you Shane) weren't all logging onto eachothers usernames, dropping > $1000 on knives only to let the seller keep them as advertisement, being set up by the aforementioned classes to become more well-off clones of the teacher, or teaching said classes after making only three knives.

With all respect, and hoping not too offend,
Jeb
 
It is always difficult for me to try to express my thoughts in writing. That is one of the main reasons I decided to go into the Engineering field. I can speak much more fluently in numbers, equations, acronyms, and theory than I can in English. Inevitably someone will misinterpret my words, from their original intent, but I will try to be as concise as possible.

I have been making knives for a bit over three years and tried my hand at going full time for about six months and eventually went back to my “day job.” Everything I make is sole authorship with the exception of alloying my own metals and growing my own burl. I struggled trying to learn what it takes to “break into” the knife making scene. Much advice was given to me by many a great maker.

The notion that I can attend the "Seminar for the High Performance Knife," replicate the work of another maker, and subsequently quit my day job, is disturbing to me, and I would hope to other makers as well. It devalues all the time, effort, and struggle other makers have put into, and are putting into their craft.

I guess the aspect that bothers me the most is what I perceive as the “hocus pocus voodoo” of 52100 steel. This is where science needs to speak. I have heard about a “lab” that does testing on the steel but I have not seen any of the “lab” results. Granted I have not done an exhaustive search, but if there was some quantitative evidence to the characteristics of the “high performance” steel, you would think they would be published on the purveyor’s website.

All the performance characteristics have been quantified by qualitative measures. Edge flex tests, cutting test, bend tests, and etching tests are great to get an idea of what is going on, but by no means are they accurate enough to quantify a repeatable process. I would not give them any more credit than the testing Cliff Stamp performs. There is not any repeatability in the test methods or procedures.

Another one of my perceptions is what I see as the obvious intent of this thread at being a rouse. Like the old saying goes; “there is no such thing as bad publicity.” As long as people are lulled into believing the Ed Fowler “smoke and mirrors” approach to knife performance they will continue to propagate the nonsense and recruit new believers. Most of Ed’s posts seem to be blowing his own horn and advertising his seminar. It is the “let me tell you how great I am” mentality.

I am not trying to disenfranchise the work Ed has done, but if it sounds too good to be true…….well, you know the rest of the saying.
 
I Don't see a thing wrong with the Blades looking like a Fowler at all. I am not a fan of Ed's blades they just don't flip my switch but and i mean but they are proven performers and that cannot be disputed. I was taught by Bill Bagwell to forge blades and guess what, my finnished knives look somewhat like a Bagwell. Why is that? partially because i have had a fondness for his knives for years but also because they work!!!! There are arguements for and against the coffin handle just like there is for the sheephorn handle but one thing is these gentlemen have taken the time to impart there knowledge on those of us who are just learning. Joe Shmoe cannot afford a Fowler but maybe he can afford a Burke or a Deveraux Same "school" of thought just different makers same teacher. I think Mr. Deveraux probably did something that some of the rest of us should have he probably spent more time on fit and finnish on his first knife than some of us did. He maybe did not finnish the first hunk of steel he forged or maybe not even the first fifty. Howmany of us finnished a forgeing that should have been discarded? I know i have and it has come back to bite me. okay enough of my rant.
 
Butch has not responded as he is attending a funeral out of state. If he choses he will respond when he returns.

Most of what we teach at the seminars is available to all in what I have written. We have learned some new events and readily share them, we, none of us, have any secrets.

This is a topic that has not been discussed before as far as I know, and feel it is healthy to discuss all events in the world of knives.

It is not my desire to teach all makers, only those who honestly chose to persue the high performance knife. If that persuit is your goal you will be welcome at the Willow Bow.

The only competition any of us have as knifemakers is with ourselves, I love it when Bill or Eldon or Butch experiment and through their skills and drive add to our knowledge about the high performancce knife, believe me I learn from them. They take valuable time from their lives to help share our knowledge and I appreciate their contribution.
 
I've just returned from Colorado after attending a funeral of a family member and thought I'd check in to see what's been happening. :eek: .
I honestly thought long and hard about whether or not to post the price that Dan paid for my knife. In my first posts about him buying it I didn't announce the price. Dan read those posts and then asked me several times if I would post it and said that he felt that I should. So after alot of thought I figured I would announce it.
I have read all of your responses and I am not going to say that anyone is right or wrong in their responses because after all we are all entitled to our own opinions and I respect that.
After 700 miles of driving and a funeral all in the past 36 hours I am not going to try and respond right now but I will definitely try to answer everyone in the next day or so.

Butch
 
Hey all,

With all the Fowler knives in my avatar I don't expect my post to be met without a fair bit of cynicysm but I feel compelled to add my opinion. First of all I feel that Shane's question speaks of his integrity, more than it pegs him as a shill, and he made some valid points. Maybe it wasn't gentlemanly of him to do so, or for Butch to post the details of his first sale, but I don't believe anything was done intentionally.

It's obvious that there's a bit of jealousy and/or resentment that Butch sold one of his first blades for such a high price. I do feel that it was a tidy sum for that piece but the level of craftsmanship was high, he used a really nice piece of horn, and it was made to Ed's "recipe". As far as paying your dues, or gaining experience, that will tell in the finer details of his design and execution in the years to come. Laredo, I know you've been making knives for at least a couple of years, but why would you say you must be doing something wrong by selling a knife for the same price? I haven't handled your knife but they look to be crafted to about the same level, although in different ways.

I do agree that paying your dues is mostly an investment of time but don't see how having to suffer through anything will further your knifemaking ability, although it might well serve to build some character. And while socializing and contributing to the knife community in general will help your exposure greatly, is it not the give and take between student and teacher that will count the most? As far as the knives being made in the same style I don't see them as being close enough at all. Building a knife under Ed's guidance using his techniques will impart certain qualites to your blade, and even using brass and sheephorn will make the knives seem similar, but it is that investment of time that seperates Ed's work in the details. Clearly visible to those actually buying his knives.

"Dues ? My thoughts are that they are earned by seeking to know the soul of lady knife and caressing her from start to finish in complete control and understanding of each and every stage of her development. "

and

"For someone who speaks SO eloquently and intelligently about Art and the internal voice of emotion, allowing your proteges' to become carbon copies is a disservice to yourself, them, and the rest of us. Paying dues is finding out who you are, singing with your own voice, what value you offer to the world, and never being satisfied with "good enough". "

Two different opinions and I don't feel either calls for "waders".
 
I've been watching this thread and have been very reluctant to post. I really don't think the the DUES PAYING is the real issue.

When Butch sold this knife I think it was great that he was able to receive such a price, but would that price have even been considered if Ed Fowlers name wasn't mentioned. Just because it was made in a knife class looked over by Ed that doesn't and shouldn't automaticly propell the maker to a higher standard. That should be earned in more ways then attending a week or 2 class.

With knife making classes springing up all over the world these days I sincerely hope that the public isn't taken in by all the bullcrap. These classes should be looked upon as tools to help a makers knowledge on the road to better the art and the craft. When some one advances quickly because they attended such a class put on by whomever it might be, it only steals from all that have given years and knowledge to advance us all.
In short I hope it doesn't come down to WHO YOU KNOW more THEN WHAT YOU KNOW.
Believe me I know some makers with so much knowledge that it surpasses what could ever be taught in a 5 year long class and they get little credit. Some say credit is given where credit is due, believe me in this profession thats not true. There are some amazingly talented makers that never get noticed, because they won't drop names.

Again I truly hope the public that looks upon this thread, doesn't sum up that you must attend such classes to be a exceptionally talented maker, that just because so and so didn't look over your shoulder while you were making your first knives that they are second rate, so much talent would be wasted and lost if that was to happen.

Joes, if you'll look at the time, effort and knowledge Laredo needed to produce that piece, you might not understand the price reasoning either.

As for eloquent speaking, we all have our own opinions there too.

Have a nice day and don't throw sand.

Bill
 
was talking about value. Just because it looks like a Fowler or to a lesser degree of cost, a Burke, does not make it so.
Kohai, this makes more sense and I get what you're saying. I've said this before and I'll say it again: when it all boils down to it, a knife is only worth what someone pays for it. At some point, the materials + labor of the knife is paid for and whatever is left is what the buyer is paying for a name, a "feeling," and frankly in many cases, hype. Or some other intangible I didn't mention. These intangibles just don't exist until you have a name for yourself, which I guess is what "paying dues" sort of means.
 
In short I hope it doesn't come down to WHO YOU KNOW more THEN WHAT YOU KNOW.
Well, I know enough to know that I don't know very much, so I hope that counts for something! ;)
 
Back
Top