I'm sure it's due to lateral stress right at the apex ...
It has to be, the compressional strength is way higher as the knife is harder than the wire.
... that the cutlery world's view on how thick and obtuse an angle is required for a knife edge is out of whack.
This doesn't hold in general, just with most north american knives and specifically most current north american knives.
I guess old "truths" die hard, as I still hear the guy behind the counter at one knife shop telling people you need 30 degrees per side so you have enough steel behing the edge to support it, otherwise your edge retention would suffer.
This is just due to a lack of critical thinking and a promotion of acceptance on faith.
It's funny how the opposite is true, but I wonder how many newbies hear that and take it as gospel? It would be great to never hear that nonsense again.
Yup, and the vast majority of popular "facts" are of similar connection to reality.
Ok, dumb this down a little, Cliff, is 13C26 in effect a better steel for the applications of said knives,(heat treat notwithstanding), from the 440A that Kershaw was using or not?
As a simple comparison, 440B and 12C27M are both on the same tie line and thus offer the same hardening responce (about 60 HRC max) and corrosion resistance. The difference is that 440B has a much greater fraction of chromium carbides and thus offers more wear resistance but lower edge stability.
Thus in thick edges you pick 440B and for thin edges you pick 12C27M. More coarse edges would also favor 440B and prying/impacts would favor the 12C27M steel. So in short, if you are grinding very thick and obtuse edges you would look at the 440 series steels not the Sandvik stainless because they are optomized for a completely different geometry.
As I have noted before, this already happened, people used AEB-l (13C26) in thick edges knives, it was compared to the high carbon stainless, quickly regarded as low end (which it is if you use it like that) and ended up in every FAQ as an entry level "beater" steel. In reality this isn't close to its performance, but if you use a greyhound as a sled dog then bad things are going to happen and it for sure isn't the dogs fault.
I think I will test my ZDP Horn (I'm 90% sure I will right now), and I will talk to Cliff, and if he gives the OK I will do the test on the U2 also, probably at a 20 degree microbevel, but only if my Horn doesn't have a really bad experience, even if he does give the OK.
If you want to try to split a piece of wood by hitting the U2 with a sledgehammer, dig a hole in concrete, fight off invading ninjas, etc., then go ahead, the outcome of some events should be obvious but if you want to make sure and quantify them then by all means indulge your curiousity. I would suggest that you do these kind of things last and not let your wife know you are doing them or the men in white coats might make a visit. If in general you are interesting in done to-failure tests on knives but have monetary restrictions then drop me an email with the types of knives you are interested in.
-Cliff