BuckShack
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2015
- Messages
- 3,222
That's it! Lol.How about a box of them?
That's it! Lol.How about a box of them?
The two that Buck has made and called "Bullet Knives" don't look like any Bullet knives that I remember.
I'll wait for the REAL Bullet Knives.......the memorable classics.
Blades should be stamped rather than "etched" (or whatever the cheap process they're now using is called).
Why do I get the impression that Buck is going do the Remington thing cheap rather than right?
I'm sure the quality will be there, but if they don't look like the original Bullet Knives......what's the point?
OB,I have 2016 and 2017 bullet knives. They are made the same way, etched Remington logo on the blade, round Remington stamp on the tang. From what I can see if Remington bullet knives had a stamped logo on the blade it wasn't recent.
O.B.
I have 2016 and 2017 bullet knives. They are made the same way, etched Remington logo on the blade, round Remington stamp on the tang. From what I can see if Remington bullet knives had a stamped logo on the blade it wasn't recent.
O.B.
I think you missing the obvious. Buck is building knives for Remington. It's Remington that wants people to buy them. If Buck makes 1,000,000 knives for Remington and no one buys them that's on Remington. Buck, as the subcontractor still gets paid.
Folks act like these are Buck knives being made. They aren't. They're Remington knives made by Buck. Complain to Remington.
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.Remington has struggled to find a subcontractor since Camillus went bankrupt in 2007.
They've tried Bear and Son. They've tried Chinese subcontractors. Apparently they've not been happy with either.
A big part of the issue is, "who owns the tooling?" I know that Camillus owned the tooling for the knives they made for Buck such as the 307. I suspect they also owned the tooling to make the Remington knives. I know that Bear and Son bought a lot of Camillus tooling at the bankruptcy sale. So it's likely that Bear and Son had tooling to make traditional patterns for Remington, maybe even some of the patterns that Camillus made for them.
If Remington has no has no tooling to go along with their name, then someone has to figure out who is going to pay for new tooling. Tooling is friggin' expensive to engineer and produce. Buck has the 500 tooling. Remington has the name. So "Voila" Remington 500s.
If these don't sell, hopefully Remington will figure out that they gotta have tooling to make their knives. Not sure that they will figure it out, but REMINGTON is in the driver's seat. They have to make the call.
I'm a little hesitant to post pictures of non buck knives in the buck knife forum, but here is one. If you want to see more, go look under Remington at some of the large online knife retailers. Some have quite a few back years still for sale.OB,
Can you post a photo of your 2016 & 2017 Remington Bullet knives for the tread? I'm just curious to know what the last few years knife style was!
Thanks
JB
Agreed, 500 is a great knife.The 500 is a fantastic knife! These are two fantastic American companies working together! This is a great first effort!
I really can't believe what I read here sometimes. This is good, not bad. We should be happy, not sad.
The two that Buck has made and called "Bullet Knives" don't look like any Bullet knives that I remember.
I'll wait for the REAL Bullet Knives.......the memorable classics.
Blades should be stamped rather than "etched" (or whatever the cheap process they're now using is called).
Why do I get the impression that Buck is going do the Remington thing cheap rather than right?
I'm sure the quality will be there, but if they don't look like the original Bullet Knives......what's the point?
I'm a little hesitant to post pictures of non buck knives in the buck knife forum, but here is one. If you want to see more, go look under Remington at some of the large online knife retailers. Some have quite a few back years still for sale.
O.B.
I like those!The 500 is a fantastic knife! These are two fantastic American companies working together! This is a great first effort!
I really can't believe what I read here sometimes. This is good, not bad. We should be happy, not sad.
I agree it's a fantastic knife. It's just that myself and a believe a lot of other folks were wanting to see some established Remington patterns being brought back and made by Buck and not a standard Buck model with some Remington attributes added. As others have stated it's still early so I have hope that will still come to pass.The 500 is a fantastic knife! These are two fantastic American companies working together! This is a great first effort!
I really can't believe what I read here sometimes. This is good, not bad. We should be happy, not sad.
I agree it's a fantastic knife. It's just that myself and a believe a lot of other folks were wanting to see some established Remington patterns being brought back and made by Buck and not a standard Buck model with some Remington attributes added. As others have stated it's still early so I have hope that will still come to pass.
Not a perfect example but bear with me. Imagine Randall contracting Buck to make their knives and the outcome is a Buck 124 with Randall stamped on the blade with a leather handle. It may say Randall but that's the only thing Randall about it.
the etch aint so bad. bob loveless used to say he only acid etched his blades as he felt the stamp degraded the steel. now new steels and better heat treats likely that isnt an issue anymore if it ever was...what do i know im no knifemaker.