OilMan
Gold Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2004
- Messages
- 4,283
Why does everyone that defends strider have to be a spook, spook wannabe, socom wannabe or a huckster?
For the same reason anyone who says they have a problem with them supposedly has an agenda most likely?
And it seems funny that no one has said anything about being junk until a Die Hard brings it up like someone else said it. Take this thread for example, the main person who keeps saying/hinting that they are junk is you when, in reality, none of the non die hards have said the same. Making the leap from "I have a Strider with some issues" to "Striders are Junk" always seem to come from the die hards. In fact, when I had my issues, which never mentioned anything being junk at all, Mick himself started saying that they were junk and inferring that I was the one who said it. I guess when you can't win a debate with the truth you have to resort to deflection?
oil
ps. In agreeance with dt I would change the "none of the non die hards have said the same" to "most of the non die hards don't say the same".
