- Joined
- Jun 16, 2003
- Messages
- 20,206
I have a WWII Mk II ("Ka-Bar") that a fella had rehandled and sharpened by Draper (then wondered why it went so low on ePrey). It's 5/32" thick at the spine, and H. Draper caused the knife to be sharp, although he didn't mess with the factory primary bevel. Is that a "thick" knife for purposes of this discussion? It seems "big" with its 7" blade.
I have a golok - like the khukuri another traditional knife used by folks who don't know and don't care what we think. It tapers, but averages 3/16" at the spine, with a generally flat primary bevel and a high convex secondary bevel. It can easily cut 1/16" tomato slices - but is obviously unhandy for fine tasks. No point, for one thing. (I'll bet they carry a small knife too.) Is it "thick"? Does it help to tell you it's 1.5" wide? Very acute. Sure seems "big."
I have a couple of folders with 1/8" thick blades. They sure seem -- well -- thick -- less suitable for fine work than other choices.
I suggest that "one size fits all" does not select the optimal tool whether your favorite is "thin" (whatever that means for you or me) or "thick" (ditto). The more interesting (if unnecessary) question is, "What is the best all-rounder?"
[sorta' OT WARNING}
And if we're havin' THAT discussion, what's the best length? That, after all, is part of "big," is it not?
"The question of blade length comes up when you talk about shape. To some degree, the question is academic since all shapes and types are not available at all lengths. If you are determined on a specific shape, say a Finnish, you'll search a long time for one langer than 5 inches, unless you get a fish knife.
People are fond of saying that the real experts carry short knives, the implication being that a guy with a longish knife is a klutz. That is just not so."
I have a golok - like the khukuri another traditional knife used by folks who don't know and don't care what we think. It tapers, but averages 3/16" at the spine, with a generally flat primary bevel and a high convex secondary bevel. It can easily cut 1/16" tomato slices - but is obviously unhandy for fine tasks. No point, for one thing. (I'll bet they carry a small knife too.) Is it "thick"? Does it help to tell you it's 1.5" wide? Very acute. Sure seems "big."
I have a couple of folders with 1/8" thick blades. They sure seem -- well -- thick -- less suitable for fine work than other choices.
I suggest that "one size fits all" does not select the optimal tool whether your favorite is "thin" (whatever that means for you or me) or "thick" (ditto). The more interesting (if unnecessary) question is, "What is the best all-rounder?"
[sorta' OT WARNING}
And if we're havin' THAT discussion, what's the best length? That, after all, is part of "big," is it not?
"The question of blade length comes up when you talk about shape. To some degree, the question is academic since all shapes and types are not available at all lengths. If you are determined on a specific shape, say a Finnish, you'll search a long time for one langer than 5 inches, unless you get a fish knife.
People are fond of saying that the real experts carry short knives, the implication being that a guy with a longish knife is a klutz. That is just not so."