Bad Paypal 1099

"Existence of "Income, from whatever source derived" is not dependent on receipt of payment by PayPal. You have just described "income" to the person described as "you." Under federal tax law, a "gift" is the voluntary transfer of cash or property without consideration. Here, the contribution by the knife recipient ("your buyer") was in consideration of his payment to the charity. You have income of $600 and the "buyer" has no deduction. His "charitable contribuition was" a "sham." If you both get caught, both will suffer negative consequences. And there is no statute of limitatuions for tax fraud. IRS may miss it. They're pretty messed up.
Thanks for your comment but please understand I contemplated no tax fraud of any kind. And of course the knife provider in my scenario would receive nothing for himself. All funds would go only to the charity.

Seemed like a way to do some good while not having to deal with the paperwork hassle of a 1099-K. But I asked because I truly want to know if this would be a legitimate option. And I appreciate your take that it wouldn't be.
 
Last edited:
If anyone needs a spreadsheet for this, I can provide the one I use for my business. It's a single page per year with income and expenses on the same sheet. I'm nearing the point of needing to separate by month but for now it's all one page. I created it in google docs and the formulas should easily transfer for Excel or open office. I can explain to anyone interested. If you're not computer savvy, I'll do my best to just explain how to get it to work as I have had to do this a lot in my day job as Excel is not something many people are good at it, in my experience.

Basically, the sheet tells you if you have income or a loss over the course of the year. It sums up expenses and revenue and spits out a few numbers, the important one for this topic being whether you have income or not from knife purchases. I have it set for chronological order but you could easily put it all together for individual knife purchases (purchase price, sale price, shipping, PP fees are the typical transactions for just knife purchase and sale for me).
 
Last edited:
Haven't read the whole thread yet, but will PP send a 1099 for F/F transactions? I send my kids' lunch money through PP friends/family quite often.
 
Haven't read the whole thread yet, but will PP send a 1099 for F/F transactions? I send my kids' lunch money through PP friends/family quite often.

No - that really is friends / family. You are safe with that one.

The 1099 is a possibility after $600 in cumulative sales is reached , through Goods / services ( or Cash app, Venmo, possibly Zelle ).

I still find it comical they call this “American Rescue Plan”
 
They're just making sure the poor people pay their fair share too... I guess. It always makes me curious if the revenue to the IRS will offset the administrative costs for implementing this type of thing. It seems like they're really after small fry on this one as MOST people who likely have reasonable actual sales are already reporting this.

I wonder if they'll get an initial "income" from it because people don't have the original purchase price and can't prove the purchase vs sale price difference, but eventually people will have all of that and most will be a net loss again.

Did someone mention if this was inflation corrected as well, for things that have been held onto for a while? I know a lot of guys will buy a knife/gun/etc. hold onto it for a while and sell it for what they put into it, except that selling 3 years later the dollar is worth a little less, or a lot less as is the case right now.
 
Last edited:
No - that really is friends / family. You are safe with that one.

The 1099 is a possibility after $600 in cumulative sales is reached , through Goods / services ( or Cash app, Venmo, possibly Zelle ).

I still find it comical they call this “American Rescue Plan”
Thanks!
 
No - that really is friends / family. You are safe with that one.

The 1099 is a possibility after $600 in cumulative sales is reached , through Goods / services ( or Cash app, Venmo, possibly Zelle ).

I still find it comical they call this “American Rescue Plan”
What, you weren't happy with getting a cash bribe up front in exchange for your additional personal tax preparation time and a generalized 7% increase in all your costs? Thanks Joe!
 
I realize this is an old thread, and I am sure somebody has thought of this already -- but I believe federal taxes (at least) have a fairly easy way to account for money (profit?) earned from a hobby. In such instances I would net it out as best I could and list my profit (if such there was). Or, if you don't sell much, list it all as "other" income & pay a few extra dollars in taxes.

Perhaps it is time for folks involved with hobby related endeavors to lobby their state officials for an easy way to address their gains/losses.
 
Got my 1099K, and I have no idea how PP determines the values. It says 7 transactions and just under $1300. But my records indicate 14 transactions, and just over $3300. $2k difference? Makes no sense🤨🤔. Last year there was a discrepancy too, but was only a couple hundred dollars, and I think it may have been because one sale was actually F&F. So, totally confused, but at least it's been in my favor.
Figured out the discrepancy...well most of it anyway. Just got another 1099, this time from ebay. Totally forgot how they don't pay out thru PP anymore. This one is for about $1500, so there's still about a $500 difference compared to my records.
 
They're just making sure the poor people pay their fair share too... I guess. It always makes me curious if the revenue to the IRS will offset the administrative costs for implementing this type of thing. It seems like they're really after small fry on this one as MOST people who likely have reasonable actual sales are already reporting this.

I wonder if they'll get an initial "income" from it because people don't have the original purchase price and can't prove the purchase vs sale price difference, but eventually people will have all of that and most will be a net loss again.

Did someone mention if this was inflation corrected as well, for things that have been held onto for a while? I know a lot of guys will buy a knife/gun/etc. hold onto it for a while and sell it for what they put into it, except that selling 3 years later the dollar is worth a little less, or a lot less as is the case right now.
There is not much of an increased administrative cost to the IRS for the implementation of this. The new law requires that 3rd party vendors send 1099s to anyone who has received over $600 in revenue. These are electronic and are tied to the user by Social Security number. Computers will simply look for desprepancies between reported income from an individuals tax returns, and the total income from 1099s, W2, etc that are received by the IRS. The cost for implementation of this law is on the 3rd party vendors, not the IRS.

There will never be a net loss for the govt. here, because hobby income can only reduce your hobby revenue to 0 prior to 2018, and you may not be able to claim any hobby expenses since the passage of the TCJA in 2018. You can not claim losses on hobbies like you can on business expenses.

Inflation is not factored in, just like it is not factored into any other investment, income or capital gain income that you may receive. If you buy investment property and sell in 20 years you report a capital gain, not a capital gain minus inflation.

This new law seems to be severely misunderstood. You were always supposed to report income from your hobbies. This has not changed. What has changed is that everyone has moved to 3rd party processors for convenience, and the government has recognized that they can now very easily enforce the existing laws by requiring 3rd party vendors to report the transaction total for individuals. This does not make you a business. It is still hobby income. Hobby income is taxable, and has been taxable for some time. Since most people do not keep receipts for their hobbies, this new reporting requirement is unfortunately a larger burden than it should be. I believe this is intentional, and following the TCJA it seems that you can't deduct your expenses or cost basis from your revenue anyway, so receipts don't do any good.

I see lots of people saying the easy solution is to simply move to Paypal F&F. This is tax fraud, with one of the easiest to trace paper trails that I can imagine. It is no coincidence that the most recent Build Back Better bill includes an increase of 80,000 IRS agents to “make sure the wealthy pay their fair share.” You are the wealthy. Friends and Family is intended as an easy way to gift money to friends and family, which is a tax free transaction. You can gift up to $16,000 to anyone tax free each year. If you “gift” someone $500, and they send you a knife, this is not a gift. Rest assured, PayPal and others already have algorithms in place to help identify who is using F&F to try and circumvent the tax reporting requirements. Once you are flagged, you will not only receive a 1099, you will owe the $2500 penalty to PayPal, and likely have your funds frozen. Any burden of proof to unlock funds, prove gift status, etc. will be the responsibility of the end user, not paypal or the IRS. If you think this sounds crazy, do you honestly believe that if you did 50 G&S transactions last year at $200 each, and this year you do 50 F&F transactions at $200 each that you are slipping under the radar?

Also in the recently defeated BBB plan is a reporting requirement for banks to report transactions over $600. The government realizes that even though paypal, Venmo and others are convenient, lots of people will still go back to cash and USPS money orders in order to avoid potential taxes on hobby income. However, if your bank is required to report any transaction over $600, this severely limits your ability to deal in cash without a paper trail. Sure, you can keep cash on hand, but with inflation, you are literally losing money every day by holding cash. If you think you can simply deposit $599 each day for a couple days to avoid the deposit transaction report trigger, there are already laws on the books about “structuring” deposits to avoid reporting. Note that this legislation did not pass, yet. It will eventually. The current threshold is set at $10,000 I believe.

This law is simply the first “check” move in a game of chess. Many of the laws and regulations have been in place for years, but this move is the first time that people have noticed because they can no longer ignore the laws on the books. Now a 3rd party is going to be reporting directly to the government for you. If you dont report a matching amount, you will ultimately be audited and have assets seized or payment taken from your bank account, which is likely linked to your tax return for convenience of depositing your yearly refund, right?

The end goal is multi faceted. The government wants and needs your money to operate. It has no income of its own and must take yours to survive. 2nd, In order to continue passing laws, there must be law breakers. “Too many people are circumventing the reporting requirement by using cash, we must require banks to report all deposits and withdrawals over $600 in order to make sure that the wealthy pay their fair share.” And further down the timeline, “We must move to a government controlled cryptocurrency where all transactions can be traced in order to guarantee that everyone pays their fair share, and also to eliminate illegal transactions on prohibited items like ghost guns, drugs, knives, banned books, red meat, or whatever the buzzword of the time is.” The government needs criminals in order to keep everyone else in line. It may seem far fetched to think that someone might go to prison for selling knives and making a few dollars now, but tax fraud is a crime and examples will be made to make sure everyone else pays their fair share quietly and respectfully.

The government has been playing chess for a while with citizens on the other side of the board playing checkers. We are now in a precarious position. The only way to make a meaningful change in the short term is for legislation to be reversed. Unfortunately, this means sacrifice on our end. Stop using paypal and other 3rd party systems. I understand the convenience of these systems and am personally guilty of using them for easy transactions, but they are the tools that have further enslaved us. We have all sacrificed freedom in the name of convenience. In our current system, maybe we can help reverse course by starving these giants we have created. By reducing the revenue that paypal, Venmo, and other 3rd party processors receive from our transactions, we can starve these companies. In turn, they will need to use their lobbying power to appeal to legislators to make changes. Since the most readily apparent cause of their troubles will be the recent legislation that required them to report revenue over $600, this is the first item they will go after. This is not the solution however. Everyone now knows that regardless of whether a 3rd party sends a 1099 to the IRS, you still owe taxes on hobby income that you received. If everyone still refuses to return to paypal after reversal of the recent laws, the next step could be to re-write tax law to exclude hobby income under a certain value from taxable income, or maybe exclude it completely.

Furthermore, write your representatives and express your displeasure at the current tax code. Not that you are upset that you might receive a 1099, but that you are upset that income that you might generate from your hobbies is taxable at all. While writing, feel free to express your views on increasing income taxes on the state and federal level, payroll taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, ad valorem taxes, capital gains taxes, estate taxes, net investment income taxes, mandatory health insurance taxes, etc, etc etc.


-JD
 
Last edited:
The IRS does indeed say that hobby income is taxable. So if we sell a few knives as part of our hobby, presumably that's taxable income. They also say that with a hobby (as opposed to a business) you can't deduct your expenses from that income.

But what I haven't found the answer to yet is whether the original cost of the knife (assuming you still have a record of that) is considered an "expense" so that it can't be deducted? It seems more like the basis of a capital asset, which is always subtracted from the proceeds of a sale before figuring tax on the net.

And if the cost of the knife is deducted as the basis, would the additional costs of acquisition and sale (shipping fees, PayPal fees, packaging material, etc.) likewise be added to the basis ("adjusted basis"), as typically would happen with a sale?

Andrew
 
I see lots of people saying the easy solution is to simply move to Paypal F&F. This is tax fraud, with one of the easiest to trace paper trails that I can imagine.
Yuuuuup. This overnight shift to F&F in the knife community is not going to fly under any radars. Maybe some occasional sellers will get away with it, but I think plenty of folks are risking a lot by going that route. And I bet some sellers who switch to F&F will be getting 1099s anyway, because I'd be shocked if PayPal didn't have mechanisms in place to spot just that sort of user behavior.

I'm not an accountant, but: If one sells knives at a loss, not as a business or as a hobby that produces income, it's my understanding that no taxes are owed on those sales. Sales of a capital asset -- in this case, items for personal use (the knives) -- at a loss are capital losses, not capital gains.

One can't deduct those losses and thereby reduce one's overall taxable income, but there are no gains and therefore no new taxable income; the next impact is zero. Getting a 1099 from PayPal and spending a few minutes accounting for it correctly at tax time doesn't seem like a big deal to me. 🤷‍♂️
 
This entire situation is a complete pain in the ass. I’m extremely exhausted with this BS.

The F/F loophole won’t last.

I think the “hobby” has just lost a lot of its charm. I’m shifting to trading for 90% of things I would have sold 6 months ago.

Moving forward - I think I’ll try to keep a record of every purchase ( especially through PayPal). I might start accepting goods / services again but sending an invoice to buyers ( proving I’m selling at a loss ). Would this work ? I know nothing about the fine print ..

If I buy a Hinderer on the exchange for $375.00 , sell it 3 months later for $350.00, pay a $11 dollar PayPal fee, another $15 for fully insured usps deliver and $2 for tape , $1 for gas ..

Does this make me a hobbyist, or a business ? I’m a knife lover , not really a collector, if something works for me I keep it, if not I sell it.

I’ve sold / bought hundreds of knives over the years ( lost count actually). No more.

Feedback / criticism welcome . I seriously want to know what the best approach to this BS is.

Thank you for letting me vent.
 
This entire situation is a complete pain in the ass. I’m extremely exhausted with this BS.

The F/F loophole won’t last.

I think the “hobby” has just lost a lot of its charm. I’m shifting to trading for 90% of things I would have sold 6 months ago.

Moving forward - I think I’ll try to keep a record of every purchase ( especially through PayPal). I might start accepting goods / services again but sending an invoice to buyers ( proving I’m selling at a loss ). Would this work ? I know nothing about the fine print ..

If I buy a Hinderer on the exchange for $375.00 , sell it 3 months later for $350.00, pay a $11 dollar PayPal fee, another $15 for fully insured usps deliver and $2 for tape , $1 for gas ..

Does this make me a hobbyist, or a business ? I’m a knife lover , not really a collector, if something works for me I keep it, if not I sell it.

I’ve sold / bought hundreds of knives over the years ( lost count actually). No more.

Feedback / criticism welcome . I seriously want to know what the best approach to this BS is.

Thank you for letting me vent.
Unless you buy and sell knives with the intent of making a profit, you are not a business and do not get to enjoy the potential tax benefits of being a business.

I am not an accountant, but the way I interpret the current tax law as written, since 2018, is that you can not deduct any hobby expenses from your hobby income. This seems absurd, but that is what it says. It would benefit anyone who buys and sells frequently to consult their tax advisor and ask specifically if knives or other goods can be scheduled as an asset of some kind so that it can be sold later with a cost basis for lower taxes.

 
PayPal needs to create a new payment option that allows fraud protection without business classification.

Or, if you guys know of another service that does that please post!
 
Unless you buy and sell knives with the intent of making a profit, you are not a business and do not get to enjoy the potential tax benefits of being a business.

I am not an accountant, but the way I interpret the current tax law as written, since 2018, is that you can not deduct any hobby expenses from your hobby income. This seems absurd, but that is what it says. It would benefit anyone who buys and sells frequently to consult their tax advisor and ask specifically if knives or other goods can be scheduled as an asset of some kind so that it can be sold later with a cost basis for lower taxes.

I am pretty tired right now and frankly sick to death of this topic, so maybe I missed it or am misinterpreting your assertions--are you suggesting that one cannot use a cost basis when selling a knife so as to minimize tax consequences?
 
I think we are all overthinking this whole thing. Fact is, that if you sell anything you technically owe income taxes on any profit. I view "knife folks" here as falling into three basic categories.

Flippers .... and these folks should probably classify themselves as businesses and file a Schedule C. They seem to buy and sell a lot of knives. It would be advantageous for them, as they would be able to deduct expenses in addition to any loss (purchase price vs sales price).

Then there are folks like me who like to collect knives. I buy them with no real intent on selling them. When I do sell them, it is because I've tired of them or they just don't get much use. Lots of people would classify this as a "hobby". I don't. As a matter of fact, most IRS references to "hobby income" give examples of people who make things as a hobby and then decide to sell them. I view what I (and probably many here) do as conducting an on-line garage sale. It is really no different than a traditional garage sale ... just for one or two items rather than multiple tables of STUFF! I own something, then at some point I decide to sell it ... usually at a loss. In this case (just as holders of real garage sellers should be doing ... but most don't), I owe taxes on any profit I make. I can reduce the total amount of the sale(s) by any loss .... but can't deduct any expenses. If I use Paypal ... I will now receive a 1099K. If the 1999K shows I sold knives totaling, let say $700 ..... but I originally purchased those knives for $900 .... I would owe nothing in income tax. I might need to have original receipts to prove the purchase price(s). However, If I originally purchased them for $500 ... I would owe tax on $200 in income. Again, I might need receipts. To file this on taxes, I could do it one of two ways. Report it as Miscellaneous Income, and title it as 1099K income, or report it as Investment Income, again, titling it as 1099K income. In the latter case, I would list the purchase (acquisition) dates as "various" (if multiple knives were involved).

The third category would be folks who sort of like to buy knives to check them out and then pretty quickly turn around and sell them (either on-line) or at flea markets and the like. These are what I consider borderline businesses or more closely related to the term "hobby". Obviously they are technically on the hook to pay income taxes for any "cash" sales at flea markets, etc ... and now forced to pay income tax for any profit from sales for which they receive a 1099K. How they do this boils down to how well they can justify what they are doing to the satisfaction to the IRS. If they want to deduct expenses, they have to go the Schedule C route. If they want to try to justify what they are doing in some other way, they can go the Misc Income or Investment route. It all comes down to what they can (if audited or questioned) satisfactorily justify.

To quote others .... I am not a tax attorney. However, I've been doing my own taxes forever and, even at 70, can still read fairly well. All this is based on what I've read in the applicable IRS documents.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top