- Joined
- Jan 26, 2012
- Messages
- 29,050
They remind me of old kitchen knives that have been sharpened badly. Leaving a worn spot an inch in front of the ricasso.
A blade can have a big belly and be straight from the ricasso to the apex of the belly. I see no advantage to the recurved area.
Everyone that doesn't understand what use a recurve is, doesn't understand what use a hawkbill design is either.
Totally disagree. A recurve has the advantages of accelerating material Into the blade without the end result being a hawkbill. You can use the rest of the way you can't a hawkbill. It's a bit more versatile for me. I use both just fine. A recurve certainly isn't useless.That’s completely false. A hawk bill or hook knife is a useful work knife shape. Or for horticulture. It does not have that recurved section in front of the Ricasso. A hook knife is different than a recurve blade.
One is useful the other is not.