Lee D
BANNED
- Joined
- May 27, 2013
- Messages
- 8,619
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
What are your initial thoughts on them?
I can’t comment on how grippy they’re going to be when wet, but they have a canvas micarta texture…the scales on my Junglas is the best comparison. I did try a little axe wax on them and they didn’t darken at all. The first pic is them in the plastic bag they arrived in so the dull look is misleading.What are your initial thoughts on them?
Thanks, something I'll have to keep in mind for future projects.I can’t comment on how grippy they’re going to be when wet, but they have a canvas micarta texture…the scales on my Junglas is the best comparison. I did try a little axe wax on them and they didn’t darken at all. The first pic is them in the plastic bag they arrived in so the dull look is misleading.
No problem. At $40 they cost more than the ST I put them on, but meh.Thanks, something I'll have to keep in mind for future projects.
A pic would help! Too late to ask before buying!I don't know. I'm ignorant about this stuff.
If it looks like the tip is kinda worn down, is that a "tip grind"?
![]()
Too late then! Work has already begun.A pic would help! Too late to ask before buying!![]()
I think the modified liner is a good idea. Victorinox does similarly with models like the Huntsman lite and I think the modern Campers. As for the alignment issue, I would tryy to test operation while squeezing the liners near the pins where possible to figure out the awl thickness issue. it might be contributing to the saw alignment issue. Modifying the front liner might be another way to accommodate the extra thickness. Use the awl like an automotive dolly and go to town like a dented fender with your ball peen hammer.What do you think? Comments/advice/suggestions? Do you think the awl will stop working so well when it is peened? (too tight from the extra 0.25mm thickness)
Oh yeah! Now that I think about it, a Camper would have almost the same exact liner that I'm making right now. The only difference would be the lack of a cutout on the back side for the awl, because the Camper's awl sits farther back behind the backspring for the saw layer. My awl is directly behind the liner, so my liner will have the cutout for the awl's nail nick. So basically I could've just taken apart a Camper and used that liner instead. All I would've needed to do is make the back side nail nick cutout for it. Cool.I think the modified liner is a good idea. Victorinox does similarly with models like the Huntsman lite and I think the modern Campers.
I've been doing that already. The tools keep wanting to pop out... especially the combo tool, so I'm squeezing the pivots every time I open or close something. If I'm honest I can't really tell anything from this. I think this is normal for an unpeened SAK.As for the alignment issue, I would tryy to test operation while squeezing the liners near the pins where possible to figure out the awl thickness issue
Modifying the front liner might be another way to accommodate the extra thickness. Use the awl like an automotive dolly and go to town like a dented fender with your ball peen hammer.
Yes, modern/recent ones have that liner. It is possible that a modern Mountaineer could be perfect with a cutout for the chisel too. I think I have one somewhere…I’ll try to find it and check. I don’t think you’d need the cutout, but I see how it helps access a bit.So basically I could've just taken apart a Camper and used that liner instead. All I would've needed to do is make the back side nail nick cutout for it. Cool.
I helps a lot, actually... at least if you have super short fingernails. The way the awl sits on this SAK makes the nail nick just barely peek out above the edge of the liner. It doesn't look right without a cutout and I don't know whether or not it is positioned that way because of the different spring it's sitting on.I don’t think you’d need the cutout, but I see how it helps access a bit.
It's done. I finished peening it this afternoon, but the scales have not been added yet.. All tools function with good snap and no side play.So yeah, it's pretty much ready for final assembly at this point.
So you thing it will be solved if it sinks deeper? Back in the day they shaped the tools to slide by each other, even if touching when closed. Maybe you could file a bevel on the liner, or sand the philips down a little? How mych is scraping on the liner?Has anyone experimented with modifying the backspring for the inline Phillips driver to make the tip of the driver sit slightly higher?
There is an issue with some of the more recent inline Phillips drivers striking the aluminum sideplate next to it while closing. I think it should be possible to fix this by changing the angle that the tool sits at while it is closed. This could maybe be accomplished by some strategic reshaping of the backspring with a file or dremel.
Has anyone tried this?