- Joined
- Feb 3, 2001
- Messages
- 32,359
If you prefer 30-150 knives, there's nothing wrong with that.
To me Sebenza is iconic and has stood the test of time. Sure there's nothing wrong with a Timex and will perform more accurately, but some may prefer a Rolex.
Exactly, it's an icon, it's a standard, it's an excellent example of the Cutler's art, even if it's made with a CNN milling machine, QC is second to none.
I felt the same way, but then I got one in a knife for a knife trade. So, the money thing didn't hit me as hard. Then I started using the knife and I was hooked. Granted the knife was slightly used and totally broken in. So, I didn't have to go through some of the things you hear people complaining about when they get a new one ("tight/stiff" action for example). I got a knife that was everything it was hyped to be. Since then I have bought one new one and several other used blades. I actually prefer lightly used CRK's.
That's how I got mine, it took 25 years for me to pull the trigger and I still couldn't buy one retail, I had wait the perfect trade, that said if and when I can afford another,I will get one, either a large 21 or a Mnandi to go with my William Henry H10-P Pearl Lancet, another expensive production folder of exacting tolerances.
I have found that folks who buy CR knives usually fall in one of two categories. Either they can easily afford them as a status symbol or they find a way to afford them as they appreciate the aesthetics, fineness of fit/finish, and function. As a retired college instructor, I fall in the latter category...Stainz
As do I.
I love the Sebenza and the Sodbuster equally.
Apples and oranges and I like both apples and oranges just differently.
At the risk of repeating myself, here's the problem. Whenever anyone wants to compare a folder to the industry-standard, they invariably find themselves confronting the Sebenza. There's really no way around it. They simply won't know how good their folder is until they've got a Sebenza to compare it to. Believe me, I resisted this reality for years until I finally gave in and bought one. Now I get it.
It took a long time before I could justify spending that kind of money, (actually like I mentioned earlier, I traded for it)but like buyin' a quality firearm ya get what ya pay for.
I'm going to have to side with the group who feel they are overpriced for what they are.. For me, a knife is a tool, I can no more spent $300 on a pocket knife then I can spend $5k+ on a Rolex... I have had good quality sub $100 dollar knifes serve me very well for many years...
Sort of like the Craftsman vs. the Snap on tool debate of years gone by, there both(at the time US made) and both had life time warranties... so Why spend 3 times the cost of Snap on.. and now look at them, both are made over seas...
Ya ever compare Craftsman and Snap-On, Craftsman? Craftsman bulkier, and the ergos can't compare to Snap-On or the old Williams tools from back in the day, ya get ya pay for. I'm not sayin' Craftsman don't make a good tool but ya walk into professional garage I bet you'll find more Mac Tools and Snap-On tools than Craftsman.
Bottom line, there's nothin' to get, its a quality tool and as such ya pay for that and why would ya but a quality and be afraid to use it?
Just my 2¢ worth as a mechanic and knife enthusiast of the last 40 years.