Where did I twist your words here.
You clearly state your $150 BM has .0005'' tolerances
I merely stated what the BM site said. How is that any different than you believing what CRK says, or what someone posts in the CRK forum using calipers not capable of measuring 0.0005 accurately?
and then state that CRK has inferior cs.
Again, taking something I said, and twisting it to saying it's inferior. I merely stated that CRK charges you for things like simply sharpening your knife whereas BM doesn't. Does that mean their CS is inferior? Apparently you think so.
Where is there word twisting and fanboyism on my part.
Dude, you quoted Gator, and even bolded what he said, and then 'summarized' by claiming he was saying he could buy a BM with the same tolerances as CRK at a fraction of the cost, yet there was absolutely no mention of BM or tolerances in the stuff you quoted. You've continuously accused me of saying my $100 BM has the same tolerances, when I don't even own a BM that cost me $100. Every one I own cost over $150 except for the 710 and 707 recently purchased, which were a bit less. That is being a fanboy. When you take something written, and twist it to try and make a point, simply because you don't agree with what the person said. It's no different than if I quoted what you said above, and then said, Oh, now you're saying Benchmades are the worst knives out there, and have crappy tolerances, and your $40 Delica is made better than 99% of all Benchmades. You'd be scratching your head at how I deduced that, just like everybody reading your quotes and interpretations are scratching their heads.
You, my friend, are the epitome of what we mean when we say fanboy.
.