I still don't understand the Lochsa vs. Sebenza debate? Okay, they've got similar blade shapes, and are priced "relatively" close to each other. But on is a factory knife and one is a custom. One has slab handles, one has a single billet contoured handle. One has S30V, or a limited choice of Damascus (I will admit the Gary House stuff looks awesome) whereas the other I can choose any makers Damascus I want (which I have).
I CAN understand factory versus factory comparisons. In particular the age old (well since 1999 when I came on the forums) debate of Sebenza vs. Pinnacle. Both similar blades, titanium slabbed handles. But you can buy 3 Pinnacles for the price of a Sebenza, so maybe it's not a fair comparison.
How about Buck/Mayo TNT vs. Sebenza. Both S30V, both titanium handles. The TNT however has a contoured handle, and as good fit and lockup as the Sebenza. Finish on the TNT isn't quite at the level of a Sebenza, but you can buy two of them and have money for lunch over a Sebenza.
How about Kershaw Bump vs. Sebenza. Both S30V, both titanium handles. The Bump has 3D machined/contoured handles, and multilayer anodization (maybe you like it, maybe you don't). It also has Speedsafe, the coolest gadget factor in knives since I've been into knives. Finish? The Bump is a top quality knife on par with the Sebenza. And I can buy two Bumps and have money left over versus a Sebenza.
Am I qualified to make these big statements? I think so. I own a custom Mayo, custom Onions, Buck TNT and a few Kershaw Bumps. I've had in my possesion for a few days a Lochsa (bought it for a friend, and he wanted it before I became too attatched). I buy, collect and use these knives, because I believe in the people who make them. Scott, Tom and Ken are all GREAT guys. BTW, I sold the Sebenza to buy the Buck TNT AND the Kershaw Bump!
~Mitch