- Joined
- Jan 7, 2003
- Messages
- 2,373
Keep in mind with the Chinese guns that there are two types of guns, milled and stamped. On the older guns the receiver and trigger group were milled steel. The later guns were made from sheet metal stampings. I have owned both types, my current SKS is an all milled Chinese, ex-military rifle and the quality is on par with any European gun I've come across. Actually it looks better than some Yugo's I've seen.
The SKS tends to be slightly more accurate than the AK, but that's painting with a broad brush as individual guns vary. My SKS holds to about 4 MOA and that's with a gritty trigger.
+1 to leaving them alone. I have messed around with them in the past and prefer mine stock. I also think they handle better without the bayonet, certainly much lighter in the hands.
From what I can tell the last time the SKS was issued by a major military force for front-line service was by the Chinese in the Sino-Vietnamese war (1979). To this day they still show up in small conflicts around the world but mainly in the hands of reserves or irregular forces (aside from honor guards).
As a general purpose utility rifle I place it somewhere between the Model 94 .30-30 and the AK. Power is about like a 30-30 but it holds a few more rounds, is easier to reload, faster to fire. The safety is well located at the trigger finger and doesn't make the same "clack" as the AK. It is hard to top off a partially spent magazine with the (stock) SKS, it's a matter of unloading and starting over.
You can load 11 rounds into an SKS,fill the magazine with a stripper, drop a round into the chamber, depress the top round in the magazine and move the bolt forward over top of it allowing it to seat on the round in the chamber. Some say this is hard on the extractor, I've done it on a limited basis and it works but I can't speak to long term wear.
Mac
The SKS tends to be slightly more accurate than the AK, but that's painting with a broad brush as individual guns vary. My SKS holds to about 4 MOA and that's with a gritty trigger.
+1 to leaving them alone. I have messed around with them in the past and prefer mine stock. I also think they handle better without the bayonet, certainly much lighter in the hands.
From what I can tell the last time the SKS was issued by a major military force for front-line service was by the Chinese in the Sino-Vietnamese war (1979). To this day they still show up in small conflicts around the world but mainly in the hands of reserves or irregular forces (aside from honor guards).
As a general purpose utility rifle I place it somewhere between the Model 94 .30-30 and the AK. Power is about like a 30-30 but it holds a few more rounds, is easier to reload, faster to fire. The safety is well located at the trigger finger and doesn't make the same "clack" as the AK. It is hard to top off a partially spent magazine with the (stock) SKS, it's a matter of unloading and starting over.
You can load 11 rounds into an SKS,fill the magazine with a stripper, drop a round into the chamber, depress the top round in the magazine and move the bolt forward over top of it allowing it to seat on the round in the chamber. Some say this is hard on the extractor, I've done it on a limited basis and it works but I can't speak to long term wear.
Mac