- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 2,585
This chipped too much,even at zero edge, maybe its heat treat problem or something else.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
This steel aus8 from Cold Steel is excellent performer, never had problems with it, the problem with this knife could be the zero grind, maybe the knife needed secondary edge at higher angle, and then shouldn't chip.I dislike scandi grinds anyways, and regrind all my scandisk to convex edge or full convex depends in thickness.At higher angle there shouldn't be any problems for sure.
I'm still wondering what the grind angle is. Mora uses 11.5° per side with a microbevel for most of their knives. Condor Bushlores, as an example, have a 9° per side primary grind which is why I usually don't recommend for folks to run them at true zero, as they're a bit delicate at that low of an angle with their steel/heat treatment. So I'm wondering how low they went with the grind with the Finn Wolf.
I haven't noticed a decline either.
I haven't bought many of them due to the higher street price, but when I check them out at the store, they still seem good.
I'm thinking of getting this knife when cash rolls in:
Why oh why did they use 01 for it?! I like what they do with 01 on their fixed blades, but on the folder...the bummerlife.
interesting locking system to say the least.
I'll just to oil it sometimes.
We'll see what it can do when it gets here. :thumbup:
(the money gods smiled upon me for National Knife Day)
If it rusts enough I guess it could be "virtually" a fixed blade![]()
Gotta love patina on a knife; this one's still like new:
![]()
![]()
That's what I'm thinking.
Spyderco's zero grind Scandi chipped all to hell, and I've never had any chipping issues with their other S30V blades.
Once they stuck a secondary bevel on it, no one seemed to have any more problems.
Does anyone have a confirmed second production run Finn Wolf to be able to say what the fix was?
Did they just add a secondary bevel to fix the issue?
I had the same issue with the scandi on the Spyderco Nilakka.
Gotta love patina on a knife; this one's still like new:
![]()
That's the spirit.
But my Northwoods Burnside Jack in 1095 hasn't rusted to fixed blade status yet
O1 does seem more rustomatic in nature, but I think I can handle it.
Besides, at least I won't have to worry about the guy from the patina thread looting it when the apocalypse comes (if you can figure out who I'm talking about right away, you also have had too much time on your hands the last couple of days).
That's what I'm thinking.
Spyderco's zero grind Scandi chipped all to hell, and I've never had any chipping issues with their other S30V blades.
Once they stuck a secondary bevel on it, no one seemed to have any more problems.
Does anyone have a confirmed second production run Finn Wolf to be able to say what the fix was?
Did they just add a secondary bevel to fix the issue?
Would throw one on my laser goniometer if I had the knife, but measuring the pixels on a photo and comparing to specs (3.5" blade, 3mm thick) it seems the grind is about 8 degrees per side.I'm still wondering what the grind angle is. Mora uses 11.5° per side with a microbevel for most of their knives. Condor Bushlores, as an example, have a 9° per side primary grind which is why I usually don't recommend for folks to run them at true zero, as they're a bit delicate at that low of an angle with their steel/heat treatment. So I'm wondering how low they went with the grind with the Finn Wolf.
I know that people have used them for a long time. I know people with more experience than me like them. But I see no advantage to a pure scandi grind.
Supposed pros:
Easier to sharpen: more difficult, due to more contact between blade and stone. Definitely not easier in the field, as they say.
Better for carving: extremely acute final edge lends itself to chipping and rolling, and doesn't give much benefit over a normal thin secondary bevel.
More full thickness blade for more strength: I can't see this making much of a difference. Blades don't usually break in the middle of the blade even with a ffg. And for my uses, including in the woods, it's not worth the much worse blade geometry.
Slap a microbevel on it, as I prefer to do with Moras, and it'll be better.
Would throw one on my laser goniometer if I had the knife, but measuring the pixels on a photo and comparing to specs (3.5" blade, 3mm thick) it seems the grind is about 8 degrees per side.
the steel snobbery really has almost nothing to do with it. these things are iron alloys, and all iron alloys have a limit for deformation. straight razors are ridiculously delicate, and that is because of the grind, it doesn't matter what the steel is. you can't baton through a car with one - and the entire point of a secondary or microbevel is to increase edge strength because of plastic/elastic limits. there's a reason the traditional blades have grinds 30-50% more obtuse than this, it's so they are usable - because any steel will fail if taken low enough. funnily enough, most utility/sporting knives that cut decently will also have edge bevels near 10-12 degrees. that would be quite a coincidence, if it was a coincidence - and not tool makers merely working within the limits of their input materials.