Some disconnected thoughts from when I read the article...
My boys are pretty heavily into scouts, and while fixed blades aren't banned by BSA, there is a de facto ban. Many scoutmasters discourage or ban them outright, and every camp put on by the BSA that I've been to explicitly states no fixed blades. I sat in on the safety lecture for the Woodcarving Merit Badge at a council camp this summer and nearly blew an artery from the misinformation pontificated there.
I don't have an issue w/ Cliff's recommendations in general. Boy scouts are taught to use a folder, axe, and saw. Those are pretty good tools for camping and hiking.
In specific, though:
I hate that the goto recommendation for a folder is swiss army or the bsa equivalent. I find that slipjoints are very difficult for kids to open, because their fingernails aren't strong enough. I've always pushed opinel because they have no spring and they lock.
It's true that many fixed blade sheaths suck, particularly for low-priced knives. However, most axes don't even come with sheaths, and most that do have crappy sheaths too. Why is it OK to discourage one for a poor guard but not the other?
Most axes available to scouts look like a hammer at both ends. Therefore, they teach the scouts that excessive force is necessary. The scouts learn all the wrong things because the tools are terribly constructed.
I only have a few axes and hatchets, and they all arrived with a crappy edge. I thinned them out and ground a new edge, though I don't really know what a correct edge is supposed to look like on an axe. Still, they do a pretty good job of splitting wood and don't go dull immediately. When I allow others to try them out, they're stunned at the difference in efficacy between my axes and theirs. It's like a lightbulb goes on and they realize, "That's what an axe is supposed to be like."