bodog
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2013
- Messages
- 3,097
Its a test that does not truly prove anything. But people fetishize "hard use" folders and makers happily oblige with ,25" thick prybars so people with too much spare money can feel cool claiming they batoned with a folder.
The closest thing I get to a spine wack is putting a lot of thumb pressure on the blade to see if the lock will fail to date, a CRKT and the DPX HEST are the only to fail that test.
I wouldn't say a spyderco military is a fetishized "hard use" pry bar, but I still want it to have a reliable lock. I have a spyderco mantra on the way. That's an upgraded delica for all intents and purposes. Guess what? I still want it to have a reliable lock. Don't know why that's so hard to understand. Reliability means things have been tested. Testing is meant to be demanding. Demanding testing means overkill to make sure what's supposed to be actually is. In the mechanical world most things are tested to failure so that it's a known and quantifiable failure that can be accounted for. I really don't know why people think so differently about a mechanical tool like a knife. You think most every part of an airplane isn't tested to failure? You think most car parts aren't tested to failure? You think most power tools aren't tested to failure? Yeah, they are, because companies get sued when they put crap parts on things people rely on and subsequently get hurt by due to manufacturer negligence.
Last edited: