The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
The whole point of me suggesting the blades ship without an edge is so people, with varying sharpening skills (but still capable), can make a very real determination of how each steel sharpens, and do it immediately. The edge stability was also why I said as much, because we like to sharpen our own way, and for certain tasks. If we can sharpen, then we can resharpen. We can adjust angles and finishes, and then compare how each steel performed with such changes. If people don't sharpen their own knives and always send them back to Spyderco for edge restoration, then simply evaluating each knife with a Spyderco edge would be fine. But then you miss out on a lot of info important to a lot of people. But it really depends on how wide a field of people Sal wants to involve in this; people who can't sharpen well at all aren't going to be a source of info on the 'ease of sharpening' category. Of course, nothing is stopping anyone from resharpening a factory fresh edge, but I thought it would also be a cost saving measure for Sal to skip this step and let us do it on our own.
edit-I dunno, to me, I kinda sound a little rough in this post. I don't mean to be, just want to explain my suggestion a bit more.![]()
Well, I've noticed that the vocab changes with the individual/forum, but I'm saying that the blade has a primary and not edge grind-that it looks like a knife (V-shaped cross section) but wouldn't be able to cut more than warm butterIf Sal has these little blades ground as thin as other flat ground spydies, then we wouldn't have an extreme amount of steel to remove (~.10"), but it would still be a task best handled with power equipment or very coarse paper or stones. For me, I have the choice of 50 grit sandpaper, 1x30 belts for a cheapie belt sander, a 60 grit aluminum oxide stone, a 120 grit DMT diamond hone, and a couple coarse/medium double sided silicon carbide stones to remove lots of metal with. From there I have a 600 grit DMT sharpening steel, Spyderco Profiles and ultrafine rod, 2.5 micron silicon carbide paste, and .5 micron chromium oxide on paper and leather to work with. Others with better and more equipment have a variety of waterstones, Edge Pros, more diamonds, arkansas stones, boron carbide, loaded mylar film, magic pixie dust, etc to create screaming edges with. Since Sal specifically mentioned steel junkies, I just sorta figure that also means people who are sharpening junkies.
I'd like price to be rock bottom (as rock bottom as possible, considering you're working with expensive, hard-to-machine steels), so I love the blade shape, love it as a fixed blade.
I think I can create an ergonomic handle. I think full flat grinds would be simple and consistent. 3m thick (approx .120) would be available in most steels. We'll skeletonize (weight reduction) and drill the handle so aftermarket scales can be attached.
I'd be willing to bet even most of the sharpening nuts haven't created an edge on a knife blank with no edge bevel at all.
But how are they going to have it heat treated?We all agree on using 52100 for the first run, right?
![]()
The cheapest way they can.But how are they going to have it heat treated?
Which was obvious by the smiley.The cheapest way they can.LOL it's just ajoke for those of you that don't get it.
We all agree on using 52100 for the first run, right?
They're just posersI do understand that anyone who uses just an old set of Arkansas stones to maintain their knives would waste their golden years trying to set an edge on something like S90V, so it could effectively eliminate people who may otherwise want to participate. Same with Lanskys, or people who have only the med/fine rods on their sharpmaker. Working with good silicon carbide, ceramic, and especially diamond, eliminates for me most noticeable differences in sharpening, especially starting with a fine edge. There's a different 'bite' on the hone, but otherwise time taken is about the same once all edges reach a comparable level.
Either way for me, now let's get back to some other points. We all agree on using 52100 for the first run, right?
![]()
Could someone explain "wear resistance" and "impact toughness" in the context of a small fixed blade knife and how they may affect the features we value in a good knife?
hell no. I could live with it I guess but it certainly isn't my first choice. My choice is immaterial though.The way I understand it Sal wanted to begin with steel already in use at spyderco to see how everything goes. Probably a wise choice. It's better than going out and buying hundreds of pounds of exotic steels for a project that doesn't work out for whatever reason. BTW, my vote would be 20-CV or CPM M4 for the first knife. I've got enough knives in 52100 to where it's not an exotic. Still an excellent steel though depending on the heat treatment. Also against shipping knives out unsharpened. JL