Ah I see. So I should take a personal interest in every single case then? Perhaps, Les, I should even reimburse them out of my pocket?
Les, I'm providing a venue for these people to air their problems out. Without me, they wouldn't even have that. Not to mention it serves as warning to those who don't know and would like the information. Maybe you'd be interested in taking out a few full page ads describing this (and every other deal) in a few magazines, out of your pocket? No? Then in the meantime, how about you back off?
After all, what am I going to do, ban Corkum? I don't think he's even registered. And when I've talked with him about 888 & TAD, he gave me extremely credible explanations for each. 888 got their knives, & from what I was told, TAD would have had theirs quite a while ago if someone could make up their mind. But that's he said - she said. I know from experience how certain parties can twist or omit the facts when convenient.
So how about you chill out a bit, Les. Since you are so unwilling to support this site yourself, I'm a little less than inclined to respond to your perceived "needs". Should Steve or Phil choose to contact me offline, they can do so - I'm always happy to lend a hand where I can. That doesn't mean I'm going to publish a private phone number just because you whine a little. And it further doesn't justify the peanut gallery piling on because they heard one side of a story. If you think Steve hasn't felt the effects of this thread, you'd be foolish. It's not in his best interest to not honor his obligations.