well now, this is turning into an interesting discussion. So long as the condescension is kept in check, there could be a very good exchange of ideas brought about.
****
Is it really so simple- that if one uses his knives, he is 'classified' as a 'user' and one who does not use his knives is 'classified' as a 'collector'? Can one not use the knives he collects, and yet collect knives at the same time?
Not so black and white I would say as there are MANY "collectors" that collect antique and militaria which can be VERY used.
Now with this knife, it was designed for a specific purpose. It was built using highly resistant materials, which were chosen based on that specific purpose. That purpose is not to chop logs, but rather to clear corridors through understory in a temperate rainforest environment. These plants are extremely tenacious and tough, and a lightweight folding saw is useless. I could go into great lengths to try and describe the difference between building a trail from scratch, as opposed to clearing obstructions from an existing trail, but really experience is the only way to know.
I'll be waiting to see how the design works out as well as how the blade holds up to whacking some rocks along the way
But the long term value of this knife is not important to me, or should I say the value of the knife is not nearly as important to me as the knife itself.
No argument there..."different strokes for different folks" works for me!