The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
I looked at both before I made my purchase of the SNG. I was pretty underwhelmed with the Emerson offerings for the price. I'm not saying that they're bad knives, but they just didn't offer the design, steel, fit/finish, or overall quality feeling that I was hoping to get from a high-end production knife that cost as much as all of the models I happened to look at.
I won't say I was underwhelmed with the SNG, but I just never felt that I got the value I expected for the amount of money I spent. I had the option to wait and pick up an XM-18 and I sort of feel like I should have done that instead, but I doubt I spend that kind of money on a knife for a very long time to be honest. I've just found that there is very little I need in a folder that exceeds Benchmade/Spyderco toughness. I've got fixed-blades for fixed-blade tasks and my folders just don't need to be that rugged.
I'm not saying no one needs an uber-tough folder, but I don't. If I did, it would be an XM-18, an SNG, or something from ZT.
What's wrong with the 0551? Just because it doesn't have Strider's name doesn't mean it isn't worth it:thumbup:.:thumbdn:ZT I just can't get over the recurves. When they make a strider/zt with a normal strider style blade I'll buy two. The blade they have on the 03XX just doesn't suit me.
What's wrong with the 0551? Just because it doesn't have Strider's name doesn't mean it isn't worth it:thumbup:.
I have never held a Strider but the controversy surrounding his past is enough to keep me away. I served over 25 years in the Corps and don't have much tolerance for those who embellish their military credentials.
That's understandable, I served in the USMC also, but I look past those things and see the knives for what they really are.
A lot of people tell sea stories though as you should know.
Mick Strider has treated me right in my dealing with him so I look at the man and what he has done to better himself.
I have owned and liked both Strider and Emerson knives at times but my thoughts these days are why spend the money for either when you can buy a Zero Tolerance and beat both pretty much across the board?
STR
I own both, and like both. The looks of the emersons appeal to me more, same with the feel of them. My SnG has vertical play after less than a month after purchase...I haven't even used the knife for anything besides light tasks. It does not take away from the knife because it could be fixed by bending the lock bar over slightly (i just havent gotten to it).
I don't think either would fail before the other under logical "hard" use.
Boy thats a real high quality well made "hard use" knife right there. How much was that knife, again? Go buy a cold steel american law man for sixty bucks a ZT whatever # for say 200 bucks, etc. and bet it doesn't develop vertical blade play in a month even if you beat the hell out of it. Kind makes the whole thread seem like a moot point doesn't it? You can get knives that are either more durable/tougher, made with better craftsmanship and or materials all for less money. Neither brand is worth the money, these are users, hard use tools not collectibles so there is no legitimate need to incur the extra expense. This is a prime example of the law of diminishing returns. If these knives are true hard use tools, and you can get the same kinda of hard use tool that will perform the same function and in fact be more durable or tougher translating to increased longevity then there is no legitimate reasons anyone can offer. Sure you can say I just wanted one, thats fine but that is not a legitimate reason, as your saying hey I just wanted to spend $100.00, $150.00, etc. more on a inferior tool to do the same job. Makes no sense and utterly defies logical explanation.
I own Striders, ZT, CS AL, Recon 1's etc and tested an Emerson.
I say buy what you want, but there are differences in the knives, some are noticeable and others might not be as noticeable, but they are there.
No a $60 CS AL isn't better than a Strider or an Emerson.
Different knives for people that have different price points, likes and dislikes.
They are all good, just different.
Strider takes a lot of heat more because of the price than most people would like to admit, they aren't cheap.
Once I saw and played with a friend's signed Strider Duane Dwyer custom SMF with double gunner titanium grips and the nightmare grind blade, I knew that a Strider was in my future. Now that knife was a pricey, very pricey knife. But before I acquired my SnG, I checked out the Buck Strider and decided against it. I also got a ZT 0300, plenty good, basically a Strider I suppose, but not the real thing. However, once I snagged a really nice, flickable, smooth, perfect SnG from a custom maker (he must have tweaked that knife, it's so good), it became clear to me why I really like the knife: looks, ergos, powerful thwack when flipping the blade open, solid and rugged and light -- all at once. Just a delightful, tough combination. I don't regret dropping what I did for it. Awesome knife.
I have never held a Strider but the controversy surrounding his past is enough to keep me away. I served over 25 years in the Corps and don't have much tolerance for those who embellish their military credentials.
Which do u guys like better and why?