Why not? Maybe he'd like both? Why limit your options? I got a Manix while saving for an SnG or SMF, with every intention of still buying a Strider folder. Once I had enough money to buy an Sng or SMF, I went to a dealer I know who carries them, tried some out (spent hours in the Strider section), and just couldn't justify buying one. They're not bad knives at all. They just didn't fit my hand like the Manix, inspire more confidence than I have in the Manix's lock, have enough of a performance difference to justify the price. Because of the fact that the grip felt somewhat awkward to me, how could I possibly pay more for a knife that wouldn't give me the same personal perfomance (grip security) that my Manix gives me? But YMMV.
I just don't personally think an oversized pivot (
IMHO, not an advantage because the pivot is not what breaks first on the Manix), a bead-blasted & striped blade (
IMHO, not an advantage because its not as corrosion resistant as the satin-finished blade of the Manix), a Ti frame-lock (
perhaps a "draw" on that one, but IMHO, I much prefer a steel lockback) are worth paying more money for. However, I buy knives with purely perfomance in mind. I don't doubt that the Striders are great knives, I just can't convince myself that they'd ever outperform my Manix. But YMMV. I say,
thoroughly try out both knives and then decide which is best for you. Thats the best advice anybody can really offer, as both Striders and Spydercos are good knives.
If you want a Manix, try it, and if you like it, buy it. If you like a Strider folder, try it, and if you like it, buy it. If you want both, try them, and if you like them, buy them.
Best wishes,
3Guardsmen