Actually Buck HAS had it right all these years. Hollow grinds are fine for skinning but flat and convex grinds are better -smoother cut with less likelyhood of damaging either the flesh or the skin.The point is that most Bucks were designed as all around outdoors/hunting knives, that DO allow you to cut wood without binding as well as skinning. Anyone reading this thread ever actually try to cut wood with a flat ground blade? It's absolutely the heaviest amount of friction. That's why Scandis are designed the way the are, the main (usually only) bevel does the actual cutting via a chiseling action and the uppper flat just furnishes dimensional stability and 'separates' the two wood surfaces for the follow through. Think of a Hollow ground blade as a reverse Scandi grind. It's not as effective as a scandi at bushcraft but it still works as it provides 'clearance' for the separated wood material after the cut has been initiated.
An ideal Survival blade geometry allows for a compromise between:
- Defense via a stabbing action
- Skinning
- Bushcraft ( cutting wood both dry and green)
- Cutting rope
- Leverage
- Digging
- Chopping Ice/Snow.
An ideal Survival blade geometry allows for a compromise between:
- Defense via a stabbing action
- Skinning
- Bushcraft ( cutting wood both dry and green)
- Cutting rope
- Leverage
- Digging
- Chopping Ice/Snow.
I was under the impression that hollow grinds were a great geometry for skinning game. I guess Buck and Dozier have been wrong all these years![]()