Part in bold, completely unnecessary, whether perceived as true or not. Could have said instead "Whenever somebody uses "best" for subjective items,
they are speaking only for themselves and their preferences". Problem avoided.
No, it is tactless. There is a difference. But your comment only played right into it. You could have said instead: "
I know what I like, so it's best for me". In fact, you will notice that most of the more seasoned members on here, when presenting their opinions, use that kind of language, "this is the perfect knife
for me," or "No grind is better than a flat grind,
for me and my uses,", etc. It's because they either inherently know, or have come to learn, that when discussing subjective matters it's inevitable to end up in a pointless argument when proposing one's personal opinion as absolute.
At least you didn't say "I
could care less", because that would mean you do care, at least a little.
(like maybe enough to respond...? jussayin')
That's a very nice opinion that you have there, and I respect it. Perhaps everyone should respect everyone else's opinion as well? I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with me, but just show a little class when you do it and I will respond in-kind.
I found the AUS10 in my Voyagers to hold an edge better than AUS8, and it seemed to me they sharpened more easily too, though that could be a subjective valuation due to the fact that I owned the AUS8 ones more early on in my knifing, so my sharpening skill was better one the AUS10 came around. I never had a problem with either and corrosion, though my environment and limited use of these knives didn't really put them to the test.
I have sold all my Voyagers because as cool as they are, they are just not practical cutting tools for me. I am better off using either a Spyderco or a fixed blade I made for cutting, and for the Voyager XL types of uses, one of my fixed blades will do everything it can and more, and do it more efficiently.