Here we go. To start out, a meaningful metallurgical difference and a technical classification difference are not the same thing. Metallurgists and steel companies carefully tune their steel compositions both within and without grade classifications and that is different than determining what classification it fits in. When I say that Infi is A8 mod I am not making any claims about whether or not a 0.1% Mo difference is meaningful in terms of properties.
1050 and A8 mod are not equivalent classifications. The category of steel is not 1050, it's 10XX. The 10 refers to a carbon steel which can have intentional additions of only carbon, manganese, and silicon. There are many different 10XX designations for several reasons:
1) Carbon has the biggest effect on steel properties
2) The simpler the steel the more the carbon matters. If 10V has 2.55% carbon instead of 2.45% it matters less than comparing 1045 to 1055.
3) There are historically agreed upon manganese contents for different 10XX grades despite only specifying carbon content. Which means that some small changes in the carbon designation are not actually because the carbon needed to be different.
4) Tradition
The tool steel designations, ie A2, D2, O1, etc are a little bit broader categories. For example, there are two standard carbon contents of M2: 0.8 and 1.0. They are both called M2. W2 can have a wide range of carbon, 0.7-1.3. It is all called W2. We don't have W270 and W295. If a company came out with an A2 steel with 1.1% carbon (outside of the specification), they would probably call it A2.
A8 mod or Chipper Knife steel also has some allowance for composition, Uddeholm targets 1.5% Mo and Latrobe targets 1.3% Mo. If the EDS measurement of Infi is accurate and the company is targeting 0.9% or 1.0% Mo that is still A8 mod. The difference may be important or meaningful but that does not mean that the classification changes.
In my post I said, "At the very least it is in the same 'family' of A8 mod-like steels," I didn't say that it isn't A8 mod. If the EDS measurement was somehow dead-on and the target carbon content of Infi is 0.6% instead of the typical 0.5%, or some significant alloy addition was missed, then a case could be made that it doesn't fit the A8 mod specification. That would be a stretch but the pedantic among us might make a case. I took this as an opportunity to talk about families or categories of steel, because adding 0.5% Ni to something doesn't change it from D2 to unobtanium. It may change the properties somewhat. But we don't have space alien technology. We have to understand what a meaningful difference is, how different it is, whether that matters for a grade classification, and whether that matters for people understanding what Infi is. If the EDS measurement was off by a significant amount and it is technically outside of some agreed upon specification of A8 mod, then we would say that it is in the same family but is not technically A8 mod. I'm not sure that it would matter, but it is unlikely anyway. The information we have says A8 mod. But there's a small chance it isn't.