- Joined
- Aug 7, 2003
- Messages
- 3,330
But I have seen them fail under tests where guns were subjected to muddy conditions and a cylinder locked up. Yep, that's right. A cylinder locked up. No weapon, I said NO WEAPON is fail-proof. I want a gun that works with high reliability under severe conditions. Agreed, a revolver is right up there but it is not fail-proof.
I was at one class and the instructor told everyone to drop their gun in a mud hole, pick it up, clear the weapon and start shooting. A coupe of nice .45 owners refused. They were told to leave the class. If you can't or won't practice under potentially severe conditions and baby your weapons then they are not tools. They are collector pieces. They will fail you at a time you may not expect. A gun is a freakin' tool. Just like a knife.
The cylinder possibly binding is still one point of failure compared to many for the auto. The SEALS situationally used revolvers back in the day because they were more sand resistant than the autos of the 70s and 80s. Revolvers have a tremendous history of field service, from the mud of France to the sands of Africa, to maritime operations as noted above.
I'd drop any of my pieces in the muck, FWIW. The Ruger is at least easily field stripped if something needs deep cleaning, not something that can be said of every revolver out there.
