They are trying to ban pocket knives in Hawaii

Drives me crazy this type of illogical thinking laws only govern people who follow them how is this a hard concept.

im as liberal as they come pro abortion pro wellfare pro ecology. anti religion. but goddamn i get pissed at the democratic party when they do this kind of stupid shit. :angry:
 
BAN PENS! pens are used to STAB and kill people!

BAN SPOONS! after all SPOONS made Rosie Odonnel FAT!

&*^&^$^&%&*(^&^%$%$
 
I think I'd laugh my ass off if someone tried to rob me with a monkey. LOL!!

I'd probably give the guy some cash just for the entertainment.

Monkeys can be effective tools to separate victims from their valuables.
But, it's been found the smaller ones have to be armed and dressed to intensify the fright factor:p
evil-monkey-2.jpg
 
This is ridiculous.

Somebody get on their hotline to AKTI---let's let the battle begin.

Knives are so functional, and firearms certainly have an inherent, useful, non-illicit purpose in American lives as well. How many countless lives have they saved in self defense, in survival situations, and how many families have they fed? It's how we won our independence, the muskets, tomahawks, and utility knives of Colonial times.

Just because some dumb, ignorant, ill-tempered piece of $#!@ stabs someone doesn't mean the rest of the responsible, patriotic population will. They can pry my knives and guns from my cold, dead fingers.

God bless America!

Rant over. :D
 
Hawaii Senate Bill 126 is sponsored by Senator Les Ihara, Jr., 58, a Democrat of Hawaii's 9th District. Not much is known about him except he's of Japanese extraction and he's exceptionally restrictive when it comes to the 2nd Amendment. The Japanese government has stringent laws against guns and knives. Last year, in June, seven people were killed in a stabbing attack on a busy Tokyo shopping street. The attack, coincidentally, happened at the very time Japan's cabinet ministers discussed tightening the country's already tough knife regulations. The assailant, a disaffected 25-year-old factory worker, drove a truck into a group of pedestrians, then got out and stabbing random passers-by with a 5-inch double-edged dagger he bought at a military surplus store. How often I've heard people in this country say, "If he hadn't had access to a gun, he couldn't have killed those people." People in Japan are now saying, "If he just hadn't had a knife...." So where does it end?

Hawaii has some deep Asian roots and many of its leaders aren't wed to the right of self defense that is so much a part of some of the old Anglo-Saxon and European cultures. But speaking of European, there's a nasty trend in the U.K. towards banning anything and everything that can be used for self defense. We're seeing California go more and more in this direction here in the states, too. Thus when criminals take a butter knife and turn it into a dagger, politicians actually sit back and say, "Well of all the sneaky, underhanded...why do you think we outlawed knives with points, you vermin! What we need are tougher laws!" And there's no end to it.

3392.JPG


To those who would like to write the Senator, visit the page here. I'm sure he'd love hearing from you. But be nice.
 
IMO, we have to write in situations like this.
Even a short note is fine.


If we say & do nothing to push back, people like the legislator from Hawaii may very well get their way.

Further, IMO we need an effective lobbying group such as the NRA.
 
Hawaii Senate Bill 126 is sponsored by Senator Les Ihara, Jr., 58, a Democrat of Hawaii's 9th District. Not much is known about him except he's of Japanese extraction and he's exceptionally restrictive when it comes to the 2nd Amendment. The Japanese government has stringent laws against guns and knives. Last year, in June, seven people were killed in a stabbing attack on a busy Tokyo shopping street. The attack, coincidentally, happened at the very time Japan's cabinet ministers discussed tightening the country's already tough knife regulations. The assailant, a disaffected 25-year-old factory worker, drove a truck into a group of pedestrians, then got out and stabbing random passers-by with a 5-inch double-edged dagger he bought at a military surplus store. How often I've heard people in this country say, "If he hadn't had access to a gun, he couldn't have killed those people." People in Japan are now saying, "If he just hadn't had a knife...." So where does it end?

Hawaii has some deep Asian roots and many of its leaders aren't wed to the right of self defense that is so much a part of some of the old Anglo-Saxon and European cultures. But speaking of European, there's a nasty trend in the U.K. towards banning anything and everything that can be used for self defense. We're seeing California go more and more in this direction here in the states, too. Thus when criminals take a butter knife and turn it into a dagger, politicians actually sit back and say, "Well of all the sneaky, underhanded...why do you think we outlawed knives with points, you vermin! What we need are tougher laws!" And there's no end to it.

With all due respect, I don't think someone's race or his being of non-European extraction has anything to do with this asinine proposal. Senator Ihara is probably 3rd generation Japanese-American and would be thoroughly American, with hardly any of his Japanese family roots having little or nothing to do with his thinking processes.

IMHO stupidity crosses racial lines. People and politicians will do stupid acts regardless of their race or nationality.
 
Hawaii has some deep Asian roots and many of its leaders aren't wed to the right of self defense that is so much a part of some of the old Anglo-Saxon and European cultures.

LOL!! By your logic, the UK parliament must be run by Asians.
 
I was born and raised in Hawaii, but I live on the mainland now so I'm limited in what I can do. Thanks for posting this though, I want to look into it further and get all the facts.

If this does end up going into effect, it will be very sad/distressing.
 
Hmm...isnt Obummer from Hawaii? Maybe he will stop the madness....no wait, now Im holding the crack pipe.
 
In my opinion, the interpretation of the 2nd Amendment has not been strict enough! At no time did the founding fathers say Firearms. They said "arms".
As Jill brought up earlier, legislators are blaming objects rather than the people who misuse them. We have legislators who are "childproofing". I am sure that most who introduce bills like this and support them were never taught to leave something alone and spanked(heaven forbid) if they touched. Instead I am sure their parents kept everything potentially harmful away from them or put up too high to reach. Same mentality. If we put up all the harmful objects no one can hurt themselves or each other. What the founding fathers knew and many countries have proven since is that if we put up all the harmful objects, the government may do what it wishes without fear of an armed populace taking issue.
 
Back
Top