The issue that some people can have is that a tool designed primarily for Wilderness & Survival is going to get much better analysis here than in G&G. By far. G&G is, through nobody's fault (or everybody's fault), a catch-all for home theater questions, what watch to buy, and what brand of electric razor to get.
It's putting something with narrow signal into an environment of high noise.
There are effectively three solutions:
1. We need to get more W&SS folks reading and answering G&G. Most W&SS folks are like the folks in a couple of other subforums: they don't read anything other than their pet forum. That's their fault; there's a lot of good stuff all over BFC.
2. We need a subforum inside W&SS that caters to saws, compasses, firestarters, and other related items. Some folks like that idea, I see. The problem of course is that this will wind up being a dumping ground for everything everybody can think of. And instead of having one place for this, we'll now have two.
3. We stop posting questions here about wilderness tools and survival gear, and focus only on more technical skills than specific applications. It's unfortunate, but that seems to be a likely outcome. I think it's already started.
The issue for mtwarden is I believe more common than is perceived. G&G is the wrong place for specific gear-related questions: it's where W&SS topics go to die. Here, they thrive. But I don't want to overstate the case.
I agree with the premise of the policy: for quite a while, we had ridiculous questions and topics posted here that had little to do with W&SS. Some topics were better suited for Axe, Tomahawk, and Hatchet; others had nothing to do with anything...and probably didn't even need to be on BFC at all.
But there is a baby/bathwater argument here. I prefer not to see any conversations about firearms, compasses, GPS applications, saws, firestarters, tents, etc., moved into G&G where an untrained audience will see them. And not answer, or provide an inffective reponse. I think everyone here would agree this isn't the intent or the outcome of the policy.
And, clearly, the application of many gadgets and gear are impossible to separate from the skills themselves. Where do we draw a line? Take a look at the "Astronaut Survival Saw" thread. I think that illustrates what Ken C., et al., are looking for in a "gadget" thread within W&SS.