A hard used Sebenza is more rare than a Unicorn. Even Mr Reeve himself complains about Sebenza owners who do nothing with their knives but sit on the couch, flicking then open and shut, whilst watching football. Must be an epidemic, if he is going to go as far as vocalize against it. Don't see many other complaints about that from other production knife makers. Hell, I saw someone shoot a recon1 2 times on the interwebs (the knife survived the 1st shot. Still don't see Lynn Thompson complaining about people shooting his folders, ANYWHERE. So the flicking Achilles heel of the Sebenza is obviously known by CRK, and lots of warranty claims from damage of flicking open the knives must be hitting CRK. Let's call a duck, a "duck"...ok?
Either you have hurt feelings over the test, are trolling, or are being offered some sort of consideration to be put up to this. I've seen our tirades over in the CRK forum regarding the test.
"Sweat shop labor". ROLF.
Honesty a sabenza would be something that I would want to keep nice for a situation where I would NEED to have a very well made and designed knife such as a blade in a SD situation or survival. A sabenza is an expensive knife, and I would be hesitant to scratch it up unnecessarily on a task that could be done with a cheaper knife that could easily be replaced. sabenzas are a well designed and well executed knife design. They are made from very high quality materials. I guess it wouldn't make much sense not to use it if you had it. Battle scars only add character anyways.
