The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
TWEENAHS!!!!! YES YES YES
will the zytel handles be solid on the bk 2??
i figured you guys was man enough to keep it up
Shit really? When I imagined it I pictured it slightly larger than the 9 and that it would probably out chop it. Any of you have a 9 and machax and can say what is better. I know from some other posts that the 9 out chops the brute but cant recall where it stands against the machax.IMHO, it is small.
All look super functional but the contour of the spine on that drop point tweener is just fugly. That guy needs some filework. I'll add the clip point to the collection for sure. Still up in the air about the ground spine on the BK5 and its little partner.
I agree, the tip on the BK-16 looks just like the BK-2, which does not have a very acute tip.That swedge makes sense for a media slicer, but as a do-it-all companion? The blade is saber ground, which is about the least efficient grind for a designated slicer. It has to compete with a 10 dollar MORA for edge retention and slicing efficiency to even make that spine worthwhile, IMO. I'm a huge Becker fan, but I just don't see the point on a blade this size, no1, and the apparent contrast in design purposes between different features of that blade. The drop point is functional, there's no doubt, but if it were more gradual throughout the spine, it would allow for much more accurate and solid batoning, and probably give you a nicer point to do tipwork with.
That swedge makes sense for a media slicer, but as a do-it-all companion? The blade is saber ground, which is about the least efficient grind for a designated slicer. It has to compete with a 10 dollar MORA for edge retention and slicing efficiency to even make that spine worthwhile, IMO. I'm a huge Becker fan, but I just don't see the point on a blade this size, no1, and the apparent contrast in design purposes between different features of that blade. The drop point is functional, there's no doubt, but if it were more gradual throughout the spine, it would allow for much more accurate and solid batoning, and probably give you a nicer point to do tipwork with.
CCMI, I was commenting on the swedge on the mini-5 and the awkward drop point on the drop point model. As far as slicing goes, with a Mora the media is passing through one single bevel-the edge. With the mini-5, media has to change contours 3-4 times as it passes over the blade. Now if that blade were a scandi grind or a full flat with a very fine edge, I can see sacrificing general utility for slicing performance-but to me, it seems kind of nonsense taking a blade contoured as a wilderness beater and subtracting a whole lot of general utility efficiency by grinding away the spine for ease of slicing. Just my opinion. Again, Becker has no bigger fan than I-between its ergonomic handles, fantastic steel, mostly-utilitarian design and incredible price point, I'm a big advocate. I just don't see how all these other blades are so simple, so practically designed, and then you go and throw a completely unnecessary bevel on a completely practical knife to make it better at something it wasn't even designed for. I'm sure the knife will cut, and I'm sure it'll be worth the money... I'd just much rather have it without the swedge on the spine.