It appears that I created quite a stir with my comments about my recently purchased Emerson knife. First of all, I dont believe Im a Troll. Hell, I dont even know what one is! Also, my intent was not to attack Ernest Emerson personally. For all I know, he might be a nice person and Im certain hes somebodys son. But, its his name above the door at the manufacturing plant and he is the President of Emerson Knives, Inc. When you are the President of anything, you better be prepared for both praise and criticism. The buck stops at the Presidents office
.period. In Emersons advertising literature, he expounds upon the quality of Emerson knives. The only point I was trying to make with my post is that the Emerson knife that I purchased was poor quality. To call my knife crude would be charitable. To call it junk would probably be closer to accurate. The other point I tried to make was that I tried twice to contact Emerson Knives. First, I wrote a nice letter to Ernest Emerson, sent it on December 31, 2001, and was careful to ensure that the letter was factually accurate. Its easier to write someone when your pissed as you can leave your emotions out of the monologue. Two weeks later, I sent a nice email to Emerson Knives
again, no response. More than a month has gone by and now I want retribution
no more Mr. Nice Guy.
There are a couple of other points that I wish to make. First, defective products should never make it to a companys shipping department. You have to question Emersons quality control. Hell, any bloke off the street without any knowledge of knives would question the quality of my knife, especially after I informed the person that the manufactures retail price was $199.95. When I compare my knife with others I own in the same price range, I would rank the Emerson dead last. I am personally offended when I pay good money for sub-quality products. If thats a Troll
..then I am one.