I attempted to twist nothing, you chose two of our quotes and put them together on your own. I posted my feelings, as you are fond of doing as well, and posed the possibility that you may feel differently about the correction of gross misinformation. The error in my words quoted by you was using a period instead of a question mark, as I still have no definitive answer, but in this case perhaps it could stand as a rhetorical question. So how does it work then, nobody is qualified to defend William Scagel unless of course they can somehow use his work or reputation in furthering their metaphysical claims to deeper knowledge than others, and then it is great P.R. to be his defender?
Sorry Ed, I doubt I will ever achieve your talent for hearing and interpreting what we should feel from inanimate objects. I can indeed appreciate the experience of beholding a beautiful knife, but it is a personal experience which I would not dream of defining for someone else, and I certainly would not claim to possess any deeper knowledge than the next guy over the experience. Since I dont believe in psychometry I guess I will always be just one of the average folk learning the old fashioned way.
Come on Ed, you should know that I have no desire whatsoever to square off with you like this, it doesnt benefit either of us. But I will not be dressed down by you for providing real, substantiated and documented information in dealing with an erroneous myth. I tried to be as nice as I could in the correction and still couldnt avoid your high handed reprimand. Now you have poked me and I have responded so what say we leave it at that for this one and let this thread finally cool down a little?