I did not ask why campus police need guns, but AR's. Rifles are not needed.
A handgun or a shotgun makes far more sense than handing out AR's to every patrol car. I even acknowledged that one or two in the system makes sense for that 1 in a 100 million situation.
If a stand off occurs, the AR platform is not the top pick for a countersniper weapon. It will not reliably accurately shoot through glass. Deflection of the rounds by even window glass is well documented. This is the reason for a .308 that most police special tact teams use in the shooter role.
A 5.56 is not reliable at one shot kills, even to the head, a .308 in the mellon tends to stop things every time. If storming a stand off in a dorm or class building, a 12 gauge with OO buck is much more effective at room distances than an AR. Even the aforementioned MP5 is better at short ranges.
.308 is better, but politics dictates much of the equipment we receive. ive trained quite a bit with an mp5, a .223 with the ammo we use is far more effective, especially at short distances. 12 guage is great, but difficult to manuever in close quarters. an m4 is a better entry weapon, imo.
I live next to and am on the U of Minnesota on a daily basis. It is in the top five in the nation in campus populations. I deal with the athletic dept and Administration on a business basis. I talk to the cops who are there. I know they are carrying gun, usually Glock 22's although some are carrying SIGs now. 90% of the work they do is traffic cop/metermaid. They tell me that, One guy who has been there 34 years, has not once drawn his weapon. Of all the officer i have dealt with at the U, only one has ever drawn his weapon in need, and that after a fight broke out after a concert that was on U property but was not U related.
The university cops are a duplication of powers, they really are created by the administration as a way of keeping control over the campus. If frat boy Bob strong arms a co-ed on campus, the administration does not want it getting out to the papers, private police corps allow that. Wealthy Alums are not going to send money and daughters to schools were 30% of sorority girls complain about date rape. Keep that figure under wraps and you spout figures about how safe your campus is based on "reported crimes". It does not do for a big time athletic power to loose a few star athletes for not understanding that no means no even to them.
in ca at least, institutions with populations as high as universites and colleges are required by law to provide their own security. uc and cal state have chosen to have police instead of unsworn security. they handle their own arrests rather than wait for the local agency to arrive.
University police should never have to deal with crack houses or meth labs off campus, no matter how close. That is city cops or sheriffs office work.
what about warrants served in campus housing?
They maybe sworn officers, but in most cases their powers are distinctly limited to the official property of the university. They do not have the jurisdictional authority to arrest anyone off campus in most cases. Minnesota law only allows them to work off campus when directly accompanied by a local LEO. This usually only happens when a warrant is served on a non student who has had a conflict with a student.
again, at least in ca, every full time police officer's powers extend statewide, though 'jurisdiction' may be limited by policy. ca has no law that requires city or county officers to accompany in off campus arrest.
North Hollywood was brought up, any officer who had a 12 gauge could have ended that very fast. Just shoot for the legs, buckshot in the legs would have stopped the mobility of the shooters very fast, a suspect in the open who can not move is toast no matter what he is wearing or shooting. It is common practice now to aim for the legs, pelvis area on suspect wearing body armor. The hit probability goes up considerably when you are shooting 9 pellets from a long barrel than from a hand gun.
they had shotguns. the suspects had armor covering their legs and arms. at fifty yards, buckshot on body armor is not even worth mentioning.
Remember that college campus's are by very definition crowded places. DO you want people using 1-200 yard lethal range weapons or 600 yard lethal weapons in a crowded Quad?
that is a training issue, not a weapon system issue. cities and counties are crowded as well. north hollywood was adjacent to a residential area and spilled over into the neighborhood.
Again, we ask why do campus cops need assault gear?
In the later posts, the OP posted that there were only a few going in to sergeants or LT's cars. I can handle this. I think I would have chosen other options than AR's but I can deal with senior officers carrying one or two in the system, THAT makes sense. I also listed that I think one rifle team would be appropriate for a big U campus. I have no trouble with shotties for EVERY officer, even the ones driving the Cushman's.
Before I started my own company, I worked for a company that sold products to most of the major Universities in the nation. I traveled to all of the big ten, all of the pac 10, the WAC, the SEC and Big East. It was my job to talk to people who were involved in security and crime prevention at almost all these schools, I will tell you that I met several Officers and campus security people who were doing a great job. Most were eating at the trough of public largess. Many had no idea what the true status of on campus crime was as they just did not want to know, to know was to have to do something or report it accurately. Many were wannabees who could not make it on to a real police force, it seemed that the schools that had campus security rather than campus police had far more lax standards. often they were just upperclassmen with a radio, a flashlight and a uniform.
I did not catch the Case Western event, I apologize for missing that one, however I still feel that very limited use of a patrol car AR makes sense. But I think there are way better options.