What is INFI?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I really can't remember the details of that demonstration---it was a LONG time ago. I do recall that there were a few "names" within the knife industry (not from Wauseon) standing by watching who were fairly floored.
Once again we have an oversimplification of the phrase, "edge retention." Through what use is the edge being retained? Slicing is not push cutting is not chopping, and yet all are cutting. With its large carbides, D2 will slice aggressively in abrasive cutting tasks like skinning longer than INFI with the same grind/geometry. Then again, the INFI knife will plane wood or make fuzz sticks long after the D2 version has ceased being able to do so due the edge damage the latter will incur from its much lower ability to resist damage from lateral and torsional forces. INFI's finer carbide formation as well as its high ductility despite high hardness will also allow it to support a much thinner edge than D2 can. All of that said, rating either steel as unilaterally average, inferior or superior is decidedly stupid as I see it, because the use to which they're being put has to be taken into consideration. Someone could make a large ABS competition knife out of ZDP-189, start whacking away with it and declare it "obviously inferior" to L6, 5160 and O1 as the competitor knives made from those steels kicked its ass in impact cutting tests--and they would. However, I would take such a conclusion about as seriously as I would that of a person who claims that a corvette is nothing remarkable because it can't pull a 10,000 pound U-Haul. INFI can be tested in ways that will demonstrate its strengths and weaknesses just like any other steel. Unlike many other steels, its strengths greatly outnumber its weaknesses. In my experience, it resists impact damage right along with (or even slightly better than) properly done L6 or 3V, resists staining to about the same level as D2 although INFI is less willing to pit when it does corrode than D2 is, and holds its edge in skinning about as well as A2 at the same hardness. It's also my experience that SR-101 surpasses INFI in long term slicing tasks, although only slightly. I have many knives is different steels that will outshine INFI in one category of use or another. I have never found another steel so capable in ALL types of knife use, however. Not even close.
 
Last edited:
What previously banned troll are you?

The first time you called me troll...I had edited my post before you quoted it to call me troll....so after that you're post was the trolling one.

The second time you called me Troll you did it in a Pretty Troll Manner.

Let's see if a third trolling's complaint about Troll will come.

:cool:
 
The first time you called me troll...I had edited my post before you quoted it to call me troll....so after that you're post was the trolling one.

The second time you called me Troll you did it in a Pretty Troll Manner.

Let's see if a third trolling's complaint about Troll will come.

:cool:

You posted obvious trolling attacks. Editing it out does not change that.

You still have not answered me as to your previous account name. But I have a pretty good idea.
 
Let just define what was done.

How thick Rope was?
What Brand of the Rope?
Was it completely dry? (Wet rope is easyer to cut)
What was the base for cutting?
What length of the blade part was involved?
What was initial sharpness?
What was edge angle?
What kind of cutting move - push or push + draw?

So then someone may reproduce it. I guess Busse should not have luck of enthusiasts not only to support here on bladeforums participating threads like this but as well doing this formal testing.

It is hard work to do and I am not surprized at all that nobody else doing this. I personaly limit myself to 800 first and then to 200 cuts and measure sharpness at the begining, at the end and in between. I suspect that for most knives it will be well below several thousands before it stop cutting it. However, I have 1/2" rope.

On my experience after 800 cuts almost all were ablet to cut rope easy - to cut rope edge does not require to be very sharp and after 800 it lose sharpness very very slow. This is why I choose this exponential kind of scale.

Thanks, Vassili.
 
I guess Busse should not have luck of enthusiasts not only to support here on bladeforums participating threads like this but as well doing this formal testing.

I agree, so long as it was also agreed that a Busse detractor was not the one in charge, either. *hint hint* I'd like a hell of a lot of people in the room.

CATRA testing would be the easiest comparison for what you're talking about, I'd imagine. Have multiple blades produced in very simple shapes with identical stock thickness and bevels. The problem is, if I remember right, they don't let you publish the results for commercial purposes. It'd be hard to convince a maker to put up the money and effort to do this comparison with a "You can't tell anybody the results" rule attached to it. And again, such a test only gives an extremely narrow perspective to compare the steels with. Add a corrosive environment or cutting medium into the equation and watch 440A's edge retention blow 52100 away.
 
Last edited:
would those be your tests with the results that only you can interpret?


and didn't we already decide that the angle of the edge on your knife was way too acute? what was it, 15 degrees inclusive?

that would be the game warden he reground till it looked like a mora!:eek:

then bosshog volunteered to fix it for him:eek::eek:
 
would those be your tests with the results that only you can interpret?


and didn't we already decide that the angle of the edge on your knife was way too acute? what was it, 15 degrees inclusive?

Do you mean the Game Warden with the edge that he thinned way down because he wanted a slicer... And then complained that when he tried to use it to pry into some what looked to be kiln-dried or seriously seasoned hard wood, this same edge that had been ridiculously thinned down got bent a bit and rippled a little? The very same Game Warden that Jerry Busse offered to examine for any type of manufacturing defect (and replace if any defect was found) as well as to determine once and for all the actual edge angle this Game Warden was thinned down to??? That knife?

I wonder if Vassili ever took Jerry up on that...
 
Last edited:
I reprofiled a game warden under 30 degrees myself, and ended up with a bevel about half the size of his, so 15 degrees (or less) seems about right. Fine for delicate tasks but stupid for a working blade.
 
Let just define what was done.

How thick Rope was?
What Brand of the Rope?
Was it completely dry? (Wet rope is easyer to cut)
What was the base for cutting?
What length of the blade part was involved?
What was initial sharpness?
What was edge angle?
What kind of cutting move - push or push + draw?

So then someone may reproduce it. I guess Busse should not have luck of enthusiasts not only to support here on bladeforums participating threads like this but as well doing this formal testing.

It is hard work to do and I am not surprized at all that nobody else doing this. I personaly limit myself to 800 first and then to 200 cuts and measure sharpness at the begining, at the end and in between. I suspect that for most knives it will be well below several thousands before it stop cutting it. However, I have 1/2" rope.

On my experience after 800 cuts almost all were ablet to cut rope easy - to cut rope edge does not require to be very sharp and after 800 it lose sharpness very very slow. This is why I choose this exponential kind of scale.

Thanks, Vassili.

Maybe you just don't know how to sharpen a knife properly. Keep practicing though. You'll get there one day. I have never taken the time to see how much rope any of my Busse knives can cut. But I've beat them through lots of tough wood and they stay sharp forever. I can't imagine rope is gonna be much of a challenge for them. If you don't like Busse, don't buy it. More for us that do.
 
Life would be so much simpler if you guys would put D_Nozzle on ignore like I have.
 
It doesn't help. Everybody else keeps quoting his posts anyway. I wish they'd stop doing that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top