Thank you for a most fascinating post Cambertree :thumbup:
No worries Jack; and thanks for your kind words GT, r8shell, btmccutcheon and augie.
Yes it's certainly interesting to see how many details of these old Sheffield patterns and blades have remained identical over the years.
I'm guessing that although the blades in the above catalogues are claimed to be hand forged, the blanks were actually drop forged to a standard die pattern and then ground, polished and finished by hand. Likewise for those stepped, long bolsters. It's almost like once a pattern or blade style entered the canon, so to speak, you just didn't mess with it - or more to the point, go to the expense of changing the tooling, unless a customer requested specific variations.
That clip blade with the long swoopy trailing point (to borrow one of pertinux's phrases) looks very appealing, when combined with the clean, stout lines of the Barlow handle. I think I prefer the nail nick placement on the original rabbit knife, rather than on those Schrade IXLs, though.
Jack, you're a fountain of cutlery knowledge!
One thing I did notice in those old cutlery catalogues is that steel pickers and tweezers seemed to be an upgrade option available for quite a few barehead patterns, not just for the veterinary and 'sporting knives'. I can't reference any Barlows that had them, but there were certainly short bolstered teardrop handled jacks and stockman knives that did. The tweezers look a bit sturdier than the flimsy SAK versions, and seem to have a groove and tooth pattern that intermesh when pinched closed, like good medical tweezers. I use the picks on my SAKs quite frequently - mostly to clean and oil my other slipjoints' blade channels with a bit of Ballistol moistened cotton wool.
What do people think? Would you like to see that option return in good quality steel in select models of Barlows or boys knives? Or would it ruin the appearance of the fine cover materials?
Oh, I enjoyed that clip of Charlie very much, thanks for posting the link Luger1952.