The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Excuse the non traditional
Excuse the non traditional
Seems traditional enough to me, for a fixed-blade. Just because Cold Steel went a little bonkers on that blade profile doesn't mean they own the rights to it now (despite what L.T. might think).
Just for clarification, that's an American Tanto, which came out in the 80's. It's not a traditional Japanese design.
The American Tanto is not Traditional. But under the circumstances, it gets a pass.![]()
Seems traditional enough to me, for a fixed-blade. Just because Cold Steel went a little bonkers on that blade profile doesn't mean they own the rights to it now (despite what L.T. might think).
I'm faintly familiar with the differences with the "old blades", i.e. IIRC the Americanized tanto has two straight edges and a secondary "point" where the belly would be on a traditional Japanese tanto. Functionally, however, I've been told it's basically two different designs with the same purpose. Plus you get into the whole question of just how many truly "different" blade profiles can be successfully marketed.![]()
So since you're posting this in blue it's incumbent upon me to ask: Are we disallowed from discuss the functionality vs. design/aesthetics of blade profiles in Traditionals? I can't imagine why you would post colored text if not.


I've been carrying the #15 rope knife for a few days. We're in the process of moving office locations this weekend, and while the rope knife is useful for many applications, it's pretty useless at cutting zip ties wrapped around bunches of cable. Going in today to help finish up, hopefully a little better prepared.
![]()
So since you're posting this in blue it's incumbent upon me to ask: Are we disallowed from discuss the functionality vs. design/aesthetics of blade profiles in Traditionals? I can't imagine why you would post colored text if not.
You were arguing that the American tanto was no different than Japanese tanto when viewed from the viewpoint of functionality, so there was nothing wrong with posting one here. My comment was that "functionality" does not make a knife a traditional pattern. And since that is the moderator's call to make, I used blue font./QUOTE]
I did nothing of the sort. I actually attempted to agree with you by indicating that I was at least loosely aware that the classic Japanese tanto had been "reimagined" by Western manufacturers. I thought that was clear by the Cold Steel joke I made. Evidently it wasn't as clear as it seemed.
At any rate, you can put the blue ink away. I'll be sure not to discuss blade profiles unless they can be found on a 100 year old Barlow or cattle knife going forward.
More knife content, and related! Some of my take from my recent Grand Tour of the Far East, knife-style:
![]()