The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Er, why?
It WAS patented - the patent has since expired. Trying to claim it as a trademark is an abuse of IP law imo.
If IP really worked like this then society would come to a standstill. Imagine the first automatic transmission being controlled by one company, forever, because they claim it's a "trademark". Ditto flat-screen TVs, metallic paint on cars, automatic weapons, etc etc.
The whole point of patents is to benefit society as a whole. It's a trade: The public agrees to let the inventor have a monopoly for a while, but after that time is up, anyone can use it. Abusing IP laws means the inventor is not living up to their part of the bargain.
I think Spyderco make great knives. I think their service is fantastic. But trademarking an "invention" aint right.
Trying to call opening holes in general IP (which is what Spyderco originally had trademarked, and then some) would be abuse of the notion, but trying to keep the exact shape that defines the appearance your company is far from it. And yes, Benchmade is scum for Bullying Spyderco into being able to use it.Er, why?
It WAS patented - the patent has since expired. Trying to claim it as a trademark is an abuse of IP law imo.
If IP really worked like this then society would come to a standstill. Imagine the first automatic transmission being controlled by one company, forever, because they claim it's a "trademark". Ditto flat-screen TVs, metallic paint on cars, automatic weapons, etc etc.
The whole point of patents is to benefit society as a whole. It's a trade: The public agrees to let the inventor have a monopoly for a while, but after that time is up, anyone can use it. Abusing IP laws means the inventor is not living up to their part of the bargain.
I think Spyderco make great knives. I think their service is fantastic. But trademarking an "invention" aint right.
One thing I just noticed is that the large Sogzilla is 4.75" long. I yield to no one in my likeing for many of Spyderco's knifes but it seems that it'll be a cold day in hell before Spyderco ever makes a folder that large.
I like large folders and I'll definitely be taking a look at it when it comes out, so pardon me if I don't join in the general disdain.
You've gotta be kidding me! You mean to tell me SOG's never seen some guy massacre a Spyder-hole while trying to ghetto-wave it with a dremel?.....the big-bodied blade features a new opening shape... the likes of which has never been seen before.
I yield to no one in my likeing for many of Spyderco's knifes but it seems that it'll be a cold day in hell before Spyderco ever makes a folder that large.
You've gotta be kidding me! You mean to tell me SOG's never seen some guy massacre a Spyder-hole while trying to ghetto-wave it with a dremel?All they have to do is look at a couple of Charlie Mike's knives.
![]()
I wouldn't say massacre, the one I got waved has seen a heck of a lot more use post wave than pre, and it opens up a heck of a lot quicker. Just because something isn't your cup of tea doesn't mean you need to trash it, and I value CM's time on this forum more so than yours :thumbdn:
I wouldn't say massacre, the one I got waved has seen a heck of a lot more use post wave than pre, and it opens up a heck of a lot quicker. Just because something isn't your cup of tea doesn't mean you need to trash it, and I value CM's time on this forum more so than yours :thumbdn:
Er, why?
It WAS patented - the patent has since expired. Trying to claim it as a trademark is an abuse of IP law imo.
If IP really worked like this then society would come to a standstill. Imagine the first automatic transmission being controlled by one company, forever, because they claim it's a "trademark". Ditto flat-screen TVs, metallic paint on cars, automatic weapons, etc etc.
The whole point of patents is to benefit society as a whole. It's a trade: The public agrees to let the inventor have a monopoly for a while, but after that time is up, anyone can use it. Abusing IP laws means the inventor is not living up to their part of the bargain.
I think Spyderco make great knives. I think their service is fantastic. But trademarking an "invention" aint right.
I just don't see how this is a complimentary statement, "You mean to tell me SOG's never seen some guy massacre a Spyder-hole while trying to ghetto-wave it with a dremel?" .
Calm down? I am perfectly calm, I'm not the one running all around the board starting threads with the intent to discredit a manufacturer, just because one knife looks similar to a spyderco.