When is everyone okay with copying designs?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You and I appear to share a language, yet all you can post are word games.

We clearly don't share a language. What I say makes sense ;)

If you decide to post your own opinions about anything, I might respond to them. So far, you mostly just repost other people's opinions about other people's opinions. We don't really need a parrot. I'm not interested in having to re-tell you what I said or meant when I already did.

I have posted my opinion. In this very thread no less. I would invite you to go back and read.

Maybe you could start a thread about what "is" is.

Maybe you could start a thread about what a hard use folder is. Oh wait.

Possibly you could get into personal arguments with everyone. Check that one off the list.


From your post history it is clear what is going on here. You are a troll. You will say anything to get people worked up.

Rev, sorry to have derailed this one again. But it had to be said. I am done with it now.
 
I think patents and intellectual property rights should be made stronger and more strictly enforced.
Where is the incentive to bring new things to market in the first place if someone with low morals and integrity is just going to copy you and profit from your hard work?

The only copies that bother me are the clones marketed as the real deal.

IP law needs reforming for the new millennium.
 
See there you go again. Using percentages to try give your argument a sense of legitimacy whilst everyone knows you are pulling numbers out of thin air. You could have said 100% 50% or 75% and all it really means is you have no idea where you got the number, and that you hope it will fool people into thinking you know what you're talking about. And its another example of you generalizing a whole nation while in the next sentence you blaim it on claiming I am manipulating your words. You are the one who manipulates words. In fact I pointed that out a few posts ago...
The text in red is a lie.
Further on, last time I got in to proving what I'm talking about I got this BS from you:

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...daboia-Flipper-review?p=14341880#post14341880
... First off this was always a Kevin John knive AND made by them... I never said who it was designed by. I have no idea...IMHO yes, the design is Kevin johns. Is that alien vs predator knife similar to the damm flipper? Yeah, but even thats not a direct clone. Its heavily inspired....
anim_rofl2.gif
(Sorry, couldn't resist...) But for me, I dont feel...
...I DO NOT AGREE, AND I DO NOT CARE.
Remember ? And you're accusing me now of not being specific ? How do you want me to be specific and waste my time with you if you don't except specific facts and also they are so many Chinese companies producing counterfeits ?

You want exact percentage... You perfectly know that there is no exact number for this, this whole thread doesn't work with exact numbers, including your statements. If you knew exact numbers, it'll be very easy for you simply to state it and everyone that is generalizing will shut up.
But you can't. You cant, because they will not work for you argument. What you and your buddy are doing when you cannot produce facts as arguments, is to attack the object you are conversing with, instead to concentrate on the subject of the conversation, something that is so visible here - you are accusing me in the same thing you are doing - elaborating on nothing, on guesses.
This whole thread is positioned to manipulate public opinion, not to prove point or make sensible conversation, you guys just want to make visible a different, wrong by many standards in this country, idea that there is nothing wrong with counterfeiting knifes, because they are done well. Downplaying thievery because their craftsmanship is great ? ...It doesn't matter what we will talk here, people that never touched this subject for themselves will read and will think about your point, this is what you guys are doing here, nothing else, it's a form of brainwash and attracting attention to the Chinese knifes, you like this thread to go as long as it can, nothing else...

So how do I come up with the number ? Well, "99%" in other words means "prevailing majority", I'm surprised that someone who claims that doesn't understand my Engliush doesn't grasp on this,
in the same time you get it enough to be able to analyze what I'm talking about and that I'm the one manipulating the thread... OK. Here are your numbers, it took me few minutes only browsing around...
I wanted to compare a "good" Chinese company to the rest of the crowd, especially to the one you are so impressed with: KJ and ADAI.

So the good companies that I know of, that have sites and that you can actually communicate with their people and ask question are Kizer and Reate (of course you can feel free to add more).

Reate have 6 models on their site and with the exception of the Horizon's line handle profile they all look like not being direct copies. I won't pay attention to the handle thing and will say: Reate are 100% legitimate company, providing way to get in touch with them, decent website and the whole nine yards. The situation with Kizer is almost identical. Both of those companies have presence here and a knife enthusiasts can have his questions answered by those companies reps. This is great.

Let's see if there is e same situation with Kevin John. They don't have site, you can explain to me why, I assume you know it. They don't have contact info, actually most people that are buying KJ knives don't know that this is fictitious name and there is no real person by the name of "Kevin John" associated with this company. They sell trough retailers, again - I don't know why but there is a reason for it and looking at their production I'd say: it's not monetary, correct me if I'm wrong.
So when you look it up, you get of course to aliexpress and these are the numbers:11 models, 9 of them copies, all of them labeled in this format: "Wonderful Work 100% KEVIN JOHN brand small sebenza 12C27 Steel stone washed blade TC4 Titanium alloy handle folding knife" If you replace the red text with "Strider model number" you'll get the idea what they sell. The two "original designs" are accordingly Venom I and II.
This is the company you are praising so much and they are so good that are copied by other not so honest Chinese manufacturers...

ADAI - again, two pages, I think I count 11 different models, all of them blatant copies of Shirogorov, Strider, ZT, Benchmade, Boker and so on designs.
So the two largest Chinese folding knife manufacturers, that sell much more than Kizer and Reate are selling 100% counterfeits.
To their volume I'm not adding the Wild Boar's crap and the rest of the companies that sell copies, yes, there is no way to know the exact number, but they are prevailing percentage of the Chinese companies that are manufacturing folding knives.

You can oppose this of course but instead of giving me some verbiage about fairness,integrity and honesty, stick to a real facts. To make it easier for you I'd like to see if you can add some legitimate companies to the short list with Reate and Kizer, companies that don't have counterfeits in their assortment, have legitimate sites and I can send them an email that actually someone can respond to. I bet you can do it.
 
Last edited:
The idea behind your question was already answered, page 4 post #58 : http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...-with-copying-designs?p=14427806#post14427806

No, it wasn't. There is frequently no originating company to exist or not, but there is still a family. And very little about knives are patentable.

And I was asking Plue, not Karda or you. Karda never answered the questions I asked him, and I think the discussion of what is a knock-off is interesting from someone who has such a more strident view of buying copies. So far, no one with strong opinions about copying (not counterfeiting) has articulated where the line exists in a consistent manner.


On the other hand, I have no further curiosity about your opinions, and thought you had agreed to no longer address me. Please don't answer my quoted questions to other forum members. Thanks.
 
I don't have a problem with Chinese, Taiwan, or Pakistani copies of knives, or most anything else for that matter. Simply because no matter how much we don't like it, we are going to have to get used to it now that we live in a global marketplace. I get the whole "buy made in America", mantra. But in todays global market, what exactly does that mean? For example, which is more "American", a Honda Accord made in Marysville, Ohio, or a Ford assembled in Mexico? I could go on and on, but you get the point.

Another thing we have to accept is today we have both "good China" and "bad China", with the "good" improving almost daily. By that I mean Chinese quality, especially in metallurgy, has improved leaps and bounds over the last decade. For example, look at the goods Harbor Freight sells. They are almost exclusively made in China. 10 or 15 years ago we all bought the $4.99 socket wrench sets that would either strip out or else shatter the first time you used them. Today the quality is quite good. I've been using a set of air impact sockets from them for a couple of years now, and I'm finding the quality is superb. Would I compare them to a set of Snap-On's? Of course not, but I could have bought every set on the shelf for what they charge.

Another area I'm finding enormous improvement in quality is in the area of weapon lights and illumination. I just purchased this Primary Arms Ultimate Weapons Light for one of my AR's. The quality and lumen brightness from this light is simply amazing for the price.

http://www.primaryarms.com/Primary_Arms_Ultimate_Weapon_Light_Gen_2_BLACK_p/pawl-2bk.htm

The machining, fit and finish, as well as the anodizing are all top shelf. Yes, it is "Made In China". But in all honesty, I'm retired, and I simply cannot afford to dump $450.00 into a comparable "Made In America", Surefire weapon light. And in today's rotten economy, not many others can either. Sure, there is still a lot of junk out there, but it is becoming less and less. Much the same as Japanese quality improved in the 60's and into the 70's to what it was in the 50's after Japan rebuilt from after the war. Today Japanese quality matches or exceeds anyone's. And more importantly, they are accepted as such. As opposed to when I was a kid and, "Made In Japan" was the standard symbol for junk.

I will admit to purchasing several knives from places like Bud-K and Frost Cutlery. No, they are nowhere near the quality of American made companies like Buck or Case. But not all are "junk" either. Again, the quality level of the metallurgy is improving constantly. I'm not going to get into the political ramifications of all of this, simply because it's already a dead horse that has been beaten over and over, with zero improvement in the argument itself. What IS improving is the quality of these goods. And like it or not they are here to stay. What will take longer to improve is our attitude and acceptance of them, as we become more concerned about our personal economy, and less about the world's.
 
No, it wasn't. There is frequently no originating company to exist or not, but there is still a family. And very little about knives are patentable.
... I have no further curiosity about your opinions, and thought you had agreed to no longer address me.
Well, I changed my mind. We didn't sign an agreement did we ? Plus, you may lost your interest about my opinions, but I didn't lose mine interest about why you're keep insinuating that there is nothing wrong with counterfeiting new designs.
What bothers me in your question is why the counterfeiters from China are not copying the Nessmuk design but happens to copy all current, new designs ?
 
Well, I changed my mind. We didn't sign an agreement did we ? Plus, you may lost your interest about my opinions, but I didn't lose mine interest about why you're keep insinuating that there is nothing wrong with counterfeiting new designs.
What bothers me in your question is why the counterfeiters from China are not copying the Nessmuk design but happens to copy all current, new designs ?

But I'm not insinuating that at all, and your persistent inability to understand that is trolling, and frankly; defamation. I have explained myself throughout this thread many times, and you don't or can't understand - so I wish you would stop annoying me. I am not guilty of what you accuse and can't possibly answer questions that don't relate to me.

And as I said earlier, we are not using English in the same manner. "Counterfeit" is a violation of a copyright. A Nessmuk isn't covered under a copyright. There are Nessmuk knives made in China. There is no way to answer your question because it is not logically written. Chinese (and other) counterfeiters go after current, popular products because that is what is easiest to sell - as counterfeit. Chinese (and other) knife makers copy old and new designs and features all the time - like the Nessmuk shape. That isn't counterfeiting - and is done throughout the industry.

If the counterfeiters felt they could sell thousands and thousands of counterfeit 1950s Buck knives - they would. But there isn't a market for that.
 
Last edited:
The text in red is a lie.
Further on, last time I got in to proving what I'm talking about I got this BS from you:

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...daboia-Flipper-review?p=14341880#post14341880
Remember ? And you're accusing me now of not being specific ? How do you want me to be specific and waste my time with you if you don't except specific facts and also they are so many Chinese companies producing counterfeits ?

You want exact percentage... NOPE percentages are the last thing I want. What I wanted was for you to stop using them because you were making them up. You perfectly know that there is no exact number for this,Holy crap you JUST figured that out? Awful proud of you this whole thread doesn't work with exact numbers, including your statements. If you knew exact numbers,which I have stated many times the I dont. That was why I had a problem with you posting percentages and using blanket statements. I knew where you pulled them from it'll be very easy for you simply to state it and everyone that is generalizing will shut up.
But you can't. You cant, because they will not work for you argument. What you and your buddy are doing when you cannot produce facts as arguments, is to attack the object you are conversing with, instead to concentrate on the subject of the conversation, something that is so visible here - you are accusing me in the same thing you are doing - elaborating on nothing, on guesses. I have a feeling you have a complex in which you read someones accusations and you cant help but try and reverse it on them. Kinda like when a child calls another child a name but the child being called a name lacks the intellect to think of something witty so they just repeat it like a baby.
This whole thread is positioned to manipulate public opinion Maybe your posts are, not to prove point or make sensible conversation, you guys just want to make visible a different, wrong by many standards in this country, idea that there is nothing wrong with counterfeiting knifes, because they are done well. Downplaying thievery because their craftsmanship is great ? ...It doesn't matter what we will talk here, people that never touched this subject for themselves will read and will think about your point, this is what you guys are doing here, nothing else, it's a form of brainwash and attracting attention to the Chinese knifes, you like this thread to go as long as it can, nothing else... Again there you go projecting what you think you know as fact when its just you writing fan fiction again.

So how do I come up with the number ? Well, "99%" in other words means "prevailing majority", in other words you made it up. I'm surprised that someone who claims that doesn't understand my Engliush doesn't grasp on this, You? missunderstand the english language? nah..............
in the same time you get it enough to be able to analyze what I'm talking about No I understand parts of what you write. The parts that by a real stretch of the imagination make sense. and that I'm the one manipulating the thread... OK. Yes you are, and thanks for finally accepting it and admitting it. Thats the first step. Here are your numbers, it took me few minutes only browsing around... I didnt want numbers. I wanted you to stop using numbers that had no merit.
I wanted to compare a "good" Chinese company to the rest of the crowd, especially to the one you are so impressed with: KJ and ADAI.

So the good companies that I know of, that have sites and that you can actually communicate with their people and ask question are Kizer and Reate (of course you can feel free to add more). A visible website and transparency of the company have absolutely nothing to do with whether or not a company can make consistently high quality products. Piranha is a company that produces knives here in the USA and no one knows anything about them.

Reate have 6 models on their site and with the exception of the Horizon's line handle profile they all look like not being direct copies. I won't pay attention to the handle thing and will say: Reate are 100% legitimate company, you must not have done much digging providing way to get in touch with them, decent website and the whole nine yards. The situation with Kizer is almost identical. Both of those companies have presence here and a knife enthusiasts can have his questions answered by those companies reps. This is great. And meritless. Kevin John wouldnt have a website because the products are not marketed for sale in the USA. when an american seeks out a Kevin john knife they do it knowing there is no support for the products because they arent intended for sale in the states. A good example of this happening with a "good" company is boker. They make OTF automatics as well as butterfly knives. They are not sold in the states due to them being illegal to import. You cant find these products on the US website and if you buy them you will not have a warranty or support or access to its website because the products were never supposed to be sold here.

Let's see if there is e same situation with Kevin John. They don't have site,Oh no the horror no site?!?!?! you can explain to me why, I assume you know it. They don't have contact info and you dont have a point, actually most people that are buying KJ knives don't know that this is fictitious name and there is no real person by the name of "Kevin John" associated with this company Maybe you didnt, but anyone with an I.Q. over 10 realizes that "kevin john" isnt exactly a chinese name and that it was simply the name of the company. They sell trough retailers, again - I don't know why but there is a reason for it and looking at their production I'd say: it's not monetary, correct me if I'm wrong. That is all I have been doing but you keep typing
So when you look it up, you get of course to aliexpress and these are the numbers:11 models, 9 of them copies, all of them labeled in this format: "Wonderful Work 100% KEVIN JOHN brand small sebenza 12C27 Steel stone washed blade TC4 Titanium alloy handle folding knife" If you replace the red text with "Strider model number" you'll get the idea what they sell. The two "original designs" are accordingly Venom I and II.
This is the company you are praising so much and they are so good that are copied by other not so honest Chinese manufacturers... What sellers on aliexpress do has nothing to do with the people making the knives. Just like a guy on ebay selling a knife has nothing to do with the company that made what he is selling. Why you automatically assume they are connected? well only you know. Yes that is the company that I praise so much. Because I can separate quality from the ethics and business practices. Just like some here can separate microtech & strider (among others) from their own less than favorable histories.

ADAI - again, two pages, I think I count 11 different models, all of them blatant copies of Shirogorov, Strider, ZT, Benchmade, Boker and so on designs.
So the two largest Chinese folding knife manufacturers, that sell much more than Kizer and Reate are selling 100% counterfeits.
To their volume I'm not adding the Wild Boar's crap and the rest of the companies that sell copies, yes, there is no way to know the exact number, but they are prevailing percentage of the Chinese companies that are manufacturing folding knives. No that is the prevailing percetage of what you found on a certain chinese trading site. That would be like basing all of american manufacturing on what you can find on ebay. Its meritless.

You can oppose this of course but instead of giving me some verbiage about fairness,integrity and honesty, stick to a real facts. Are you really telling ME to stick to facts? The guy who makes up percentages and pretends to know about products he doesnt purchase, own or even handle? Sure buddy. Whatever you say. To make it easier for you I'd like to see if you can add some legitimate companies to the short list with Reate and Kizer, carson labs for instance?companies that don't have counterfeits in their assortment, have legitimate sites and I can send them an email that actually someone can respond to. I bet you can do it. I did do it.

I see a bunch of words. A whole bunch of words that can be paraphrased into a single sentence. All you had to say was "You're right purpledc, I dont know what I am talking about and I lack enough knowledge of the english language to properly debate the topic or understand your responses even if I did have a clue." And I refuse to hold your hand and explain it all to you yet again. I know a lost cause when i see one and I have no desire to converse with you any further as all the points I was trying to make about you are proven and anyone with knowledge of the english language can read this thread and come to the same conclusion.
 
Last edited:
I have the same opinion as I do in the watch world. In the watch world there are clear concepts amd designations.

There are:
- Original designs
- Replicas
- Counterfeit / Fakes
- Homages

http://wornandwound.com/2013/04/02/homage-vs-replica-vs-counterfeit/

The knife in post #1 of this thread is a replica.

I personally cannot stand replicas and hate outright fakes with a passion. Fawk those loosers that copy others designs. Most homages are not a "nod to the design" or "paying respect to the design of the original artist". Most declared as such homages are way to close to a replica for me, thus I hate the majority of them.

In the case of knives hommage should only be discussed when the shape is of such iconic nature that an homage is obviously unavoidable. As an example we shall pick the Bowie. Many maker pay hommage to the "original design" keeping their knifes in the "general" shape and form as well as construction. Deviations are not seen as a new knife design, but more as a different flavor in execution.


Nobody gets upset when they see a chefs knife that looks JUST LIKE another chefs knife.

Case in point is that it is a chefs knive. All hammers also look alike. Or do they? How about axes? Your typical chefs knife is actually a western French / German design. It's thickness, shape, length and handle / bolster are pretty well defined. It a tool.

- Fun fact: The Japanese alone have more than 20 different kitchen knife shapes, all with unique names and assigned purposes. You choose based on maker. Aritsigo, anyone?

- Fun fact 2: The Santoku, famous in many western countries, is not a mans tool. It is the "Wifes kitchen knife". :)
 
Well, I changed my mind. We didn't sign an agreement did we ? Plus, you may lost your interest about my opinions, but I didn't lose mine interest about why you're keep insinuating that there is nothing wrong with counterfeiting new designs.
What bothers me in your question is why the counterfeiters from China are not copying the Nessmuk design but happens to copy all current, new designs ?

I think the problem here is no one wrote their responses in a way you and your brain can process. So let me make one final attempt.


RX-79G do not buy or condone counterfeit knifes


He not think counterfeit knife low quality just because it counterfeit.

admitting counterfeit knifes high quality not mean you Like or own


If you are still lost then so is all hope.
 
PURPLEEDC: I can make a high quality copy of a knife. Still it is not my design. In our half of the world making a perfect copy does not honor the original maker. It is exactly the opposite. It brings dishonor and shame to copy.

It means you cannot think for yourself. In the end it means you only want to make easy money. This means the counterfeit maker uses cheap metal and imperfect finishing. More disgrace.

So it is irrelevant to discuss the quality of counterfeit products (copies).
 
PURPLEEDC: I can make a high quality copy of a knife. Still it is not my design. In our half of the world making a perfect copy does not honor the original maker. It is exactly the opposite. It brings dishonor and shame to copy.

It means you cannot think for yourself. In the end it means you only want to make easy money. This means the counterfeit maker uses cheap metal and imperfect finishing. More disgrace.

So it is irrelevant to discuss the quality of counterfeit products (copies).
You live in the same part of the world as Microtech, Benchmade and the old Schrade, who have all copied designs. So what are you talking about?
 
So it is irrelevant to discuss the quality of counterfeit products (copies).
Unless, of course you own them, at which point it is completely relevant to discuss their quality. What IS irrelevant is to discuss their quality when you've never owned or used them. People who do that are little better than the counterfeiters they denigrate. Around my neck of the woods, we actually have a name for folks who engage in that sort of thing. We call them liars.
 
Last edited:
Unless, of course you own them, at which point it is completely relevant to discuss their quality. What IS irrelevant is to discuss their quality when you've never owned or used them. People who do that are little better than the counterfeiters they denigrate. Around my neck of the woods, we actually have a name for folks who engage in that sort of thing. We call them liars.

I've taken apart and used a friend's Fauxbenza, just so we're clear who's getting labeled what.
 
Then as far as I'm concerned, you have room to speak regarding the quality of the product you inspected. Talk from your own first-hand experience and you'll get no pushback from me. I won't push back if you say that all counterfeiters are thieves, either. That's simply a statement of fact. But if you come in here and make the claim that all counterfeits are junk because counterfeiters are thieves, I will challenge you. Why? Because I know better.
 
Last edited:
You live in the same part of the world as Microtech, Benchmade and the old Schrade, who have all copied designs. So what are you talking about?


I didn't read the entire thread and didn't notice you can actually speak english, haha. I only saw your last post, the line I quoted.

:D

edit: Those you mention have copied, as such they are to be classified as replicas. I won't buy them because I want to honor original designs. Kinda hard though. Schrade I'd put into borderline hommage.


I think any and all discussion of fakes / counterfeits execpt identification should be banned by TOS. This thread is totally proof of this idea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top