- Joined
- Dec 7, 2016
- Messages
- 11,261
It's like buying a Ferrari and then finding out that there is no service for it or way to get it fixed.
Yes brother! Couldn't have said it better myself. Oh wait....
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
It's like buying a Ferrari and then finding out that there is no service for it or way to get it fixed.
It's like buying a Ferrari and then finding out that there is no service for it or way to get it fixed.
How about a Ganzo clone of a Microtech? I'm sure it's only a matter of time before they rustle one up....Microtech has never been on my radar, but now they're on the "Never Buy" list along with bottom-feeding clone companies like Ganzo.
Yes, I know that. I wasn't talking about chinese clones in general though.Chinese clones of MT have been around a long time.
There are a lot of people, individuals that are not in the business of cutlery at all, just reviewers, accumulators, enthusiasts, etc. If you have your own blog, YT channel, etc then you have some degree of free speech. However free that might be, we still have to watch what we say and write. I see a lot of posts that are loaded with misinformation, half truths, lies, and blatant exaggerations of various kinds. Again, we have nothing to do between a lawsuit between one company and another, unless you are called in as an expert witness or something. I don't know and am not familiar at all with the people that Microtech is going after, nor do I care. It has NOTHING to do with me, and will not impact my life in any way regardless of what the final verdict may be. I tend not to put myself into precarious situations and I am always trying to be cognizant of what I say to people and what I write online (once it reaches the internet, it cannot be taken back and becomes part of the public record).
The context of my commentary can be twisted if I decide to try and be funny and maybe mistakenly choose the wrong words. Then my proverbial (virtual and real) ass might get into trouble. In this day and age and for the last 20+ years it's easy for one party to sue another. The case does not need to have any substance what so ever, it can simply be a move to punish someone by tying them up in court and making them spend money. If you have a few grand for a lawyer, you can pretty much file a lawsuit against anyone you want. The winner is usually the one that has the most money and can prove their case (obviously).
As far as this place goes, there is far too much conjecture about things that some folks know nothing about. Instead of stating things as such, they write things in a "matter of fact" tone that should not be challenged. That is the beginning of when people step on their pee pee. If you mistakenly spread misinformation about a company without knowing what is really going on, yes you are liable for slander and possible defamation. We all have opinions about some companies business practices, their treatment of customers, and their products. It's all in HOW we say and write those things if we chose to discuss them. Some folks get too comfortable behind the anonymity of their online persona and don't realize they are not unreachable.
Again, everyone is entitled to buy or not buy from whatever company they like for whatever resons they want. I don't see anything wrong with that and I do practice that myself to a large extent with many items that I purchase. This being an open topic, anyone has as much right to post their thoughts as you. The original question was when will everyone finally let this go, that was what I addressed in my post. The people that repeatedly post conjecture as fact are the ones stirring the pot. What that does is fill the heads of newbies with bad information and then they carry that as truth because they "read it on an online knife forum, so it must be true". It's hard to forget things when you are constantly reminded of them. Once thing to note is that at some point or another and if you search hard enough, it's not impossible to find a slightly stained area on almost anyone's halo. No one has a perfect record in every column in this business or any other. I'm not admonishing anyone, just stating a perspective that seems to have been overlooked so far.
LOL!Yes brother! Couldn't have said it better myself. Oh wait....
I am not a Microtech fanboy....yet, I have just a new utx 85 that works great and I really like.
After the whole Microtech vs. KIA issue, many on this forum seem to have rushed to judgment. The way I see it we know very little, and existing bias towards Microtech is coming out.
What do we know:
1. Microtech threatened to sue Anthony Sculimbrene of Everyday Commentary. Anthony Sculimbrene has made a retraction at: http://www.thetruthaboutknives.com/...es-formal-retraction-of-greatest-knife-piece/
The response here on the forum was that Anthony must have been pressured into doing so,....instead of giving the thought that it was on his own, a decision made as an adult, and having spent time with Anthony Marfione which doesn't strike me as the owner of Microtech trying to be a bully but instead a teacher.
2. Microtech and KAI issues: going back through a few years past it appears that at bladeshow the throw down was given, by both companies. None of us were there, and I'm sorry but KAI's rep in the past on bf has been less than respectful and couldn't handle moderating their own forum. I'm not going to judge Microtech's response, because I think Marfione explained exactly what happened, with KAI threatening to make an otf with Microtech design, and Microtech showing if that's what they wanted they would get the same thing in return.
3. Microtech and Anthony Marfione suing their own family: We again know nothing about this or the people involved. A few posters on bf empathized with family dysfunction, but most seemed to be able to immediately judge Anthony because he is suing his Son. Sorry, but family can sometimes be the first to stab you in the back, so until we know more.....again......we know nothing!
So that we know nothing, in the future when anyone asks or discusses Microtech, keep the bs out. If you have personal feelings against the company than fine, take it somewhere else, like a shrink, because I think a few people here need one.
They never threatened to copy a microtech knife. They made an otf prototype that never even went into production. Rumors are you could swap internals with a scarab. But tony ripped off the mikov otf internals. Hence why the original ultratech was never a patented knife. Tony didnt even come close to inventing the internal workings of a dual action otf. Its been around decades before he was a knifemaker.Wait, the same Thomas that left bf. The same KAI that threatened to copy Microtech Out The Front Knife? And only then did it result in ugliness between companies? See that's what I'm saying man there's just enough blame to go around I don't understand why it getsslumped on Microtech?