What I am saying is: If I write something on a post, the reader interprets how the author is feeling based on his own mood and assumptions. The emoticons are a way for people to express sarcasm, joking manners, disappointment etc in a world where only text exists. Im not sure what is hard to understand about that. The emoticons tell the reader what the author is trying to convey. However, if the author puts no emoticons in his post, the reader will not understand the intended sarcasm or tongue in cheek nature of the post.
for example: I am the greatest basketball star ever


.
the emoticons would imply I am not the greatest and most would just shrug it off as humorous.
Therefore the reader's own horrible personality (ie maybe because he got into a fight with his lady that day, hates his job/life, or maybe his parents hit him a lot, or maybe he got beat up in school and hates the world, or like in your case maybe his pecker isn't up to par) so he lashes out with his emotions and reads the post as another chance to get back at all those guys who laughed him out of the locker room back in high school ( see what I did there with the childish manhood humor, pointing out you must have compensation issues). so to sum up, if you are an angry person, you might read something as if the person is as tainted as yourself...and that's why I put the emoticons out there and later defended myself..
cheers bro...suck it