High up in the ivory tower.
....
Deep, man. Diggin' it. <snaps fingers instead of clapping>. Poetry slam!
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
High up in the ivory tower.
....
What a weird attitude. Alloy and heat treatment are both important.
Are you saying you can't get W1 or W2 to forge weld? All of a sudden these tiny amounts of alloying elements are so important?
We are talking about 1095 and W1/W2 which already a good steel aren't we?
Try working with these steel and you will understand that even tiny amount of alloy does make a huge different... you might even understood that even the same labeled steel but from difference supply are not the same.
When it come to steel, there are many thing you should learn... its not very simple as you might thought.
I do forge weld knives. I'm asking if you haven't been able to get W series steels to weld.
Most low alloy carbon steel from 5160, 52100 to O1 to W2 can be welded with 416 with proper technique/flux but the failure rate are much higher than plain carbon steel like 1095/1084 and the transition are also not very beautiful.
I didn't realize you were talking about SS to carbon welding. Thank you.
You understand this thread is not about customs? I've stated several times I have no issue with any custom knife steel.
Maybe it's my fault that didn't read the whole thread properly. But when you said pricier knife, it might lead people to thought of something like thousands dollar worth custom...
If you talking about high end, plain production knife like $300 price range then I agreed with you that 1095 is far from the best performance steel.
High up in the ivory tower. [...]
Mr. OP,
Could you give us some examples of 1095 knives that reside in the 'pricier' realm according to your all-knowing wisdom? Or is it just ESEE that you don't like?
I don't recall you giving any examples other than ESEE. Is this just a hypothetical discussion or are you secretly annoyed at ESEE for selling overpriced knives?
Finally stooped to name-calling, though. If you had noticed I specifically avoided that throughout this thread because it makes any argument look bad. But you'd rather be right than be liked.
We can discuss whatever you want, but I can't answer questions that don't make any sense. Becker is not the same steel as Tops. It is a better steel.
And I'll save you the rest of your objections - there are no two knives made by different companies that are identical - totally preventing any sort of perfect comparison of dollar to value between them.
If you feel this means you've "won", please enjoy your victory with my compliments.
So attacking me instead of answering my simple question, I see.
I have a broken Becker made out of a "better steel" but my ESEE knives are still in tact. Does this mean that possibly plain ol 1095 might be a better choice for some people doing some tasks under some circumstances?
Steel choice is a personal thing. All steels have different attributes just pick one that has the qualities you are looking for at a price you can afford. Steels aren't "better" they are simply different.
Do you honestly feel that this was a measure of anything to do with alloys? If the ESEE had been the one to break, would you have posted that on this thread in support of the OP?
I don't think ESEE or Becker have a rash of broken knives.
I have a broken Becker made out of a "better steel" but my ESEE knives are still in tact. Does this mean that possibly plain ol 1095 might be a better choice for some people doing some tasks under some circumstances?
Steel choice is a personal thing. All steels have different attributes just pick one that has the qualities you are looking for at a price you can afford. Steels aren't "better" they are simply different.
What was it a measure of exactly then? He was sharing his personal experience. Does that count for nothing?