WhiskyJack
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 101
I tend to agree with the OP, however location clearly has an impact. My trip on the Mantario trail was after a solid week of rain, everything was soaked, even all tine small twigs, but getting them lit was no problem with a bit of birch bark.
There was some birch logs left behind, which would have needed splitting because they soaked through like a sponge, but all of the pine, even stuff that was right on the ground would burn without being split. Just needed to use more medium sized branches that you could kick off a fallen tree to get the fire hot enough for wet, unsplit wood. Smoked a bit more, but I figure it would be no faster to get a roaring fire by splitting wood than doing it the way I described, though it would use a lot more energy.
But like I said, this might not be possible with different combinations of wood. If my only firewood was wet birch, it'd have to be split. If I had no birch bark or fat wood (and still using only a firesteel), again I'd probably end up having to split something.
There was some birch logs left behind, which would have needed splitting because they soaked through like a sponge, but all of the pine, even stuff that was right on the ground would burn without being split. Just needed to use more medium sized branches that you could kick off a fallen tree to get the fire hot enough for wet, unsplit wood. Smoked a bit more, but I figure it would be no faster to get a roaring fire by splitting wood than doing it the way I described, though it would use a lot more energy.
But like I said, this might not be possible with different combinations of wood. If my only firewood was wet birch, it'd have to be split. If I had no birch bark or fat wood (and still using only a firesteel), again I'd probably end up having to split something.