I find this conversation to be a bit strange.
First, we are talking about how traditionals have been around for hundreds of years and have proven themselves. I am guessing whenever a knife like a stockman or congress pattern or whatever the first multi bladed knives were, they weren't necessarily traditional, right? I mean at some point someone had to add an extra blade, and when they did, I am sure it was the "tactical-overkill" knife of it's time. I know poeple think heavy duty folders are a fad, but who can really tell the future? It is simply the direction of the industry for now, and that's all we can really know without guessing.
Second, why are big frame locks so worthless? I have skinned several animals with my ZT0561, and never found it to be useless. I have done a ton of working man's chores with it and never found it to be unnecessary, only comfortable and hand-filling. I certainly love my traditionals, but when I have solid copper wire to cut I don't reach for one in a pinch, my Case Mini Copperhead would be devastated. The other nice thing is that I can have a big comfortable handle, tough and wear resistant ELMAX blade steel, and a 3.75" blade all in a handy package clipped to my pocket, not something I can do with any fixed blade I own. I have never found my 0561 to be a hassle to carry, it carries more conveniently than my Izula 2 and is more comfortable to use with my big hands anyways.
I can certainly understand why someone wouldn't have a use for one, but to say they are useless for everyone is a bold statement. I mean, a paint brush, paint, and a canvas is of no use to me for I cannot paint, but I dare not say they are useless for everyone.
I guess I just don't understand the whole argument this thread has turned into. It was about looks, now it's about bones to pick with framelock designs and their utility. Don't worry guys, traditionals aren't going the way of the dinosaur, we are just adding to the collection.