You're saying that wrong...

[norcalAF]

Not “yinz”?

Depends on current level of intoxication

 

[RayseM]

It should be written - your guys' support. The extra s after guys is not needed, as the apostrophe goes after the plural S.

Otherwise I don't see anything wrong with the phrase though it is a bit awkward. Without your support is normal. Without the support of you guys - could work. Without the support from all you guys - is better. Your guys' support - is OK though. So I think.

 

[RokJok]

Was thinking about something a Youtuber said "...would not be possible without your guys's support" which doesn't make sense.

But "all your support" makes sense.

Do yous guys agree?

According to Texas, it could be "all y'all", as in "... support from all y'all".

 

[David Mary]

 

[Bob Denman]

View attachment 3143924

And regiments, keep regimes in power...

 

[Stelth]

I can't believe how many times I see ridiculous spelled "rediculous".

 

[David Mary]

I can't believe we didn't talk about this one yet, but I have noticed it many times: people often substitute the word "amount" for "number".

People say "amount of knives", for example, which is incorrect. It is "number of knives".

Number is for countable nouns. Amount is for uncountable nouns. Number of people. Amount of snow.

 

[SharpBits]

That's a huge quantity of amounts.

 

[Stelth]

That's rediculous.

 

[David Mary]

That's a huge quantity of amounts.

I find this a bit of a paradox. 'Amount' is normally uncountable (the amount/quantity of snow), but in your sentence you made 'amounts' countable—so strictly it should be 'number of amounts.' Of course you knew that, and your multilayered, maniacal comedic genius just broke English (more). Well played.

 

[Hatch Power]

I like to use the on vegetarians. Man shall not live by bread alone. I’ve done this several times and never been called out on it.

 

[David Mary]

 

[David Mary]

Some people's hobbies..... and I plead the fifth on who made that query.