- Joined
- Oct 19, 2011
- Messages
- 5,035
So hard to choose. Thanks to all the participants for the wonderful nominations. I think I would have gone with Julian Antunes' piece in post 20 #1 if the maker himself didn't call it a sword. So these are my choices. Let me just say, if I didn't choose a knife it wasn't because I didn't love it. I chose pieces that, to MY EYE, had the best balance of details that spoke to ME.
Post 1 #1 CAS/Lurquin - I didn't want to like this one but I can't help it. It is audacious and sinister.
Post 1 #8 M. Quesenberry - Mike's work is always top notch and this one is so elegant.
Post 18 #1 D. Franco - So bold. So imposing. So purposeful in its execution. Extraordinary knife.
Post 25 #2 S. Nowacki - Not as extravagant as some of the other entries but great flow and details just where they are needed. Just a beautiful classic Bowie.
Post 28 #3 S. Filicietti - Killer damascus, delicate and elegant details. Very classy.
Post 57 #4 J. Knight - Great interpretation of the modern Bowie by one of the guys that ushered in the modern Bowie.
Post 68 #1 J-L Regel - Wow. Every single line on that knife has purpose. Detail where there should be, restraint where there should be.
Thanks to the folks who gave my submission a second look.
Post 1 #1 CAS/Lurquin - I didn't want to like this one but I can't help it. It is audacious and sinister.
Post 1 #8 M. Quesenberry - Mike's work is always top notch and this one is so elegant.
Post 18 #1 D. Franco - So bold. So imposing. So purposeful in its execution. Extraordinary knife.
Post 25 #2 S. Nowacki - Not as extravagant as some of the other entries but great flow and details just where they are needed. Just a beautiful classic Bowie.
Post 28 #3 S. Filicietti - Killer damascus, delicate and elegant details. Very classy.
Post 57 #4 J. Knight - Great interpretation of the modern Bowie by one of the guys that ushered in the modern Bowie.
Post 68 #1 J-L Regel - Wow. Every single line on that knife has purpose. Detail where there should be, restraint where there should be.
Thanks to the folks who gave my submission a second look.
Last edited: