waynorth
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2005
- Messages
- 32,244
There has been some talk of the differences between a #35 and a #62. I thought I'd do a comparison ; Here are two single spring examples. The Tomato #62 is a bit over 1/16" longer
but decidedly slimmer in width and in thickness. More blade in the #35, both the main and secondary. The joints are more "sunk" on the #62. They both have round bolsters of course.
There are half stops on my older #62, and not on the #35!!

The #62 is much less bulky in the right front pocket, and the #35 is more "hefty!"
We are dealing with Stag vs. acrylic, but the weights are 2.82 ozs. vs. 2.02 ozs.
The #35 being the heavier one!
Nice slim grinds on all four blades make them great cutters.
Your choice!!!
My choice is that slim wharncliffe !! I still love that congress after all these years!!
Since 2011!!
but decidedly slimmer in width and in thickness. More blade in the #35, both the main and secondary. The joints are more "sunk" on the #62. They both have round bolsters of course.
There are half stops on my older #62, and not on the #35!!




The #62 is much less bulky in the right front pocket, and the #35 is more "hefty!"
We are dealing with Stag vs. acrylic, but the weights are 2.82 ozs. vs. 2.02 ozs.
The #35 being the heavier one!
Nice slim grinds on all four blades make them great cutters.

Your choice!!!

My choice is that slim wharncliffe !! I still love that congress after all these years!!
Since 2011!!
